28th Annual Highway Report
Reason Foundation

Annual Highway Report

28th Annual Highway Report

Introduction

Reason Foundation’s 28th Annual Highway Report evaluates state highway systems on cost versus quality using a method developed in the early 1990s by David T. Hartgen, Ph.D., emeritus professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. This method has since been refined by Hartgen, M. Gregory Fields, Baruch Feigenbaum, and Truong Bui.

Since states have different budgets, system sizes, and traffic and geographic circumstances, their comparative performance depends on both system performance and the resources available. To determine relative performance across the country, state highway system budgets (per mile of responsibility) are compared with system performance, state by state. States with high rankings typically have better-than-average system conditions (good for road users) along with relatively low per-mile expenditures (also good for taxpayers).

The following table shows the overall highway performance of the state highway systems in the 28th Annual Highway Report, primarily using data that each state directly reported to the Federal Highway Administration.

Similar to last year, the top-performing states are a mix of large and small states as well as states that are more urban and more rural. (Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, and Figure 1). Five large-population (more than seven million people) states place in the top 10 of the overall rankings: North Carolina (2nd), Virginia (4th), Tennessee (5th), Georgia (6th), and Ohio (10th).

Numerous factors—terrain, climate, truck volumes, urbanization, system age, budget priorities, unit cost differences, state budget circumstances, and management/maintenance philosophies—all affect overall performance in the Annual Highway Report. The remainder of this report reviews the statistics underlying these overall rankings in more detail.

The overall rankings are not dramatically different from the previous version of the Annual Highway Report. However, three states’ overall ranking improved by double digits this year, while two states’ overall rankings declined by 10 or more spots:

  • Idaho improved 19 positions from 34th to 15th in the overall rankings, as rural Interstate condition improved by 34 positions and urban Interstate condition improved by 22 positions. In addition, the rural fatality rate improved by 20 positions.
  • Maine improved 11 positions from 32nd to 21st in the overall rankings, as rural Interstate condition improved by 24 positions. Capital disbursements also improved by 12 positions.
  • New Jersey improved 10 positions from 44th to 34th in the overall rankings, as administrative and maintenance disbursements improved by 15 and 25 positions respectively. Rural Interstate condition improved by 12 positions.
  • Massachusetts declined 20 positions from 20th to 40th in the overall rankings, as rural Interstate condition declined by 23 positions. The state also fared poorly in disbursements. Administrative disbursements worsened by 19 positions and maintenance disbursements declined by 26 positions.
  • Arkansas declined 15 positions from 13th to 28th in the overall rankings, as rural fatalities declined by 25 positions and urban fatalities worsened by 39 positions. Capital disbursements also declined by 10 positions.

28th Annual Highway Report: Each State’s Highway Performance Ranking By Category

StateOverallCapital & Bridge Disbursements RatioMaintenance Disbursements RatioAdmin Disbursements RatioOther Disbursements RatioRural Interstate Pavement ConditionUrban Interstate Pavement ConditionRural Arterial Pavement ConditionUrban Arterial Pavement ConditionUrbanized Area CongestionStructurally Deficient BridgesRural Fatality Rate Urban Fatality Rate Other Fatality Rate 
North Carolina 1751320171510213139939
South Carolina 2246127102272318444148
North Dakota 3261415116320251422967
Virginia41291251126817379352316
Tennessee5111328219161892711274342
Georgia68153222141323435253929
Minnesota7293636368141722912216
Utah 847342732101810616610179
Missouri 9311527182314222039263217
Ohio1062018262632936141391231
Kentucky11151723124307142233172247
Wyoming 122327982142618829361422
Connecticut 13189142091532283221302621
Florida 144025232349553910384827
Idaho 1549331740237121272023515
Montana 161638192513224271832414424
Alabama172214246332941178332926
Mississippi 181328932353832628404230
New Hampshire19928464421198333419320
Indiana 204649166342234282414455
Maine 212135112436442924615423
Kansas223823344915211321522111935
Michigan 233322131538411633264332419
Nevada 2436264934520111353472537
Texas253218381922341138402373443
Wisconsin262410243930333944242771010
South Dakota 273139451271123151148211540
Arkansas2825632139403630423434636
Arizona 29277413041123020301453841
Nebraska 3028322916162535491536203112
Iowa 31442133172824402634961118
Maryland 321931224725442745451412811
West Virginia3351274353145131050341350
New Jersey 34391610381243294150305168
Oregon 3534473937171926234115463544
Illinois 3645243029293742344638162128
Pennsylvania 3717373133373931374245122025
New Mexico381034435403634392516425034
Oklahoma3937433742363843311241223049
Massachusetts 40124143184328334649372484
Delaware414464810462116484493638
Rhode Island 42303020714494838473122
Colorado4342452613474537353619324032
Vermont44354850483154824978714
New York 454142404142482847474041813
Louisiana461419445454946423444133746
Washington 4750504750442725433117182733
Hawaii 482082514504740192650471
California 4943443543464741504425283345
Alaska50484021284885019133548493

View national trends and state-by-state performances by category:
overall
Overall
capital-bridge-disbursements-per-mile
Capital & Bridge Disbursements
maintenance-disbursements-per-mile
Maintenance Disbursements
administrative-disbursements-per-mile
Administrative Disbursements
total-disbursements-per-mile
Other Disbursements
rural-interstate-percent-poor-condition
Rural Interstate Pavement Condition
rural-other-principal-arterial-percent-narrow-lanes
Rural Other Principal Arterial Pavement Condition
urban-interstate-percent-poor-condition
Urban Interstate Pavement Condition
rural-other-principal-arterial-percent-poor-condition
Urban Other Principal Arterial Pavement Condition
urbanized-area-congestion-peak-hours-spent-in-congestion-per-auto-commuter
Urbanized Area Congestion
bridges-percent-deficient
Structurally Deficient Bridges
fatality-rate-per-100-million-vehicle-miles-of-travel
Rural Fatality Rate
fatality-rate-per-100-million-vehicle-miles-of-travel
Urban Fatality Rate
fatality-rate-per-100-million-vehicle-miles-of-travel
Other Fatality Rate