-
Amicus Brief: Roberts v. McDonald
The Supreme Court should take the case because "race-based distribution of antiviral treatments is plainly unconstitutional."
-
Amicus Brief: Memmer v. United States
The government’s argument would put landowners in a Trails Act-limbo where the government has denied them use and possession of their land but the owners are not entitled to compensation unless and until the railroad and trail-sponsor reach a trail-use agreement.
-
Amicus Brief: Gonzalez v. Google
For nearly three decades, Section 230 has served as the backbone of the Internet, precisely as Congress correctly anticipated and intended.
-
Amicus Brief: Association Des Éleveurs De Canards Et D’oies Du Québec v. Rob Bonta
Section 25982 of the California Health and Safety Code prohibits the sale in California of a wholesome food ingredient in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause and poses a grave challenge to the future of food and agriculture in the U.S.
-
Amicus Brief: Ariyan Incorporated v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
The Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans took private property from seventy owners.
-
-
Amicus Brief: SEC v. Romeril
The condition that the Securities & Exchange Commission imposed on Barry Romeril’s settlement of its claims infringes on the First Amendment rights of all who wish to hear Romeril’s story.
-
Amicus Brief: McDonald v. Firth
Subjecting mandatory bar associations to “the same constitutional rule” as public sector unions now means subjecting them to exacting scrutiny that reveals unjustifiable violations of attorneys’ First Amendment rights by the bar associations.
-
Amicus Brief: Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina
The Equal Protection Clause prohibits the government from denying “any person . . . the equal protection of the laws.”
