• Education
  • Pension Reform
  • Taxes & Gov’t Reform
  • Transportation
  • Data Visualization
  • Reason twitter
  • Reason facebook
  • Reason youtube
Reason Foundation
  • About
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Email Newsletters
    • Events
    • FAQs
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Staff
    • Trustees & Officers
    • Shop
    • Savas Award
  • Experts

      Browse Our Experts

      • Aaron Smith
        Director of Education Reform
      • Adrian Moore
        Vice President of Policy
      • Austill Stuart
        Director of Privatization and Government Reform
      • Baruch Feigenbaum
        Senior Managing Director, Transportation Policy
      • Guy Bentley
        Director of Consumer Freedom
      • Leonard Gilroy
        Vice President, Government Reform
      • Robert Poole
        Director of Transportation Policy
      • View All Experts
  • Topics

      Browse Our Topics

      • Air Traffic Control
      • Annual Highway Report
      • Consumer Freedom
      • Coronavirus
      • Drug Policy
      • Education
      • Government Reform
      • Pension Reform
      • Privatization
      • Transportation
      • View All Topics
  • Publications
    • Amicus Briefs
    • Annual Highway Report
    • Annual Privatization Report
    • Aviation Policy Newsletter
    • Backgrounders
    • Commentaries
    • Data Visualization
    • Email Newsletters
    • Pension Reform Newsletter
    • Policy Studies
    • Surface Transportation Newsletter
    • Testimony
  • Reason.com
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving

Amicus Briefs

  • Amicus Brief: Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard
    Amicus Brief: Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard

    Harvard’s discrimination against Asian American applicants prolongs a long history of discrimination against Asian Americans in the United States. The judgment of the district court should be reversed.

    February 26, 2020

  • Amicus Brief: West v. Winfield
    Amicus Brief: West v. Winfield

    The reasoning embraced by the Ninth and Second Circuits—requiring a Section 1983 plaintiff to point to a decided case with identical, or nearly so, factual allegations in order to defeat qualified immunity—sets an impossible standard

    February 20, 2020

  • Amicus Brief: Torres v. Madrid
    Amicus Brief: Torres v. Madrid

    This Court should reverse the Tenth Circuit and return uniformity and predictability to the Court’s Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.

    February 8, 2020

  • Amicus Brief: Fleck v. Wetch
    Amicus Brief: Fleck v. Wetch

    The case warrants this Court’s review because many state and local governments are refusing to comply with Janus’ waiver requirement.

    December 26, 2019

  • Amicus Brief: Salgado v. United States
    Amicus Brief: Salgado v. United States

    Because lower courts have charted a course around CAFRA’s fee-shifting provision, inefficient and unmeritorious civil asset forfeiture actions are not adequately deterred.

    December 17, 2019

  • Amicus Brief: Shaffer v. Pennsylvania
    Amicus Brief: Shaffer v. Pennsylvania

    This Court should grant the petition for a writ of certiorari to clarify the applicability — if any — of the “private search” doctrine to today’s digital world.

    December 16, 2019

  • Amicus Brief: Valent v. Commissioner of Social Security
    Amicus Brief: Valent v. Commissioner of Social Security

    The Supreme Court should take this case to resolve the question of what tools the lower courts must employ in a search for the meaning of a statute.

    September 19, 2019

  • Amicus Brief: Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue
    Amicus Brief: Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue

    The Supreme Court should act to protect religiously neutral student-aid programs from lower court rulings and state government actions that run afoul of the federal constitution.

    September 17, 2019

  • Amicus Brief: Competitive Enterprise Institute and National Review v. Michael E. Mann
    Amicus Brief: Competitive Enterprise Institute and National Review v. Michael E. Mann

    If this were the law anywhere in the country, it would represent a profound danger to free speech and debate.

    July 17, 2019

  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • ...
  • 13
  • Next

Follow

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS

Email Updates

Get weekly updates from Reason.

More About Reason Foundation

  • About
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Email Newsletters
  • Events
  • Jobs and Internships
  • Medical Disclosure Information
  • Policy Research
  • Reason magazine
  • Shop

Contact

Reason Foundation
5737 Mesmer Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90230
(310) 391-2245

1747 Connecticut Ave NW
Washington, DC 20009
(202) 986-0916

Privacy Policy
Accessibility

 
 
Copyright © 2022 Reason