29th Annual Highway Report: Summary of findings and rankings
ID 190909138 © Khairil Azhar Junos | Dreamstime.com

Annual Highway Report

29th Annual Highway Report: Summary of findings and rankings

Four of the top five states, Virginia, Georgia, North Carolina, and Ohio, rank among the 15 most populous states in the country.

Reason Foundation’s Annual Highway Report tracks the performance of the 50 state highway systems. Each state’s overall rating is determined by rankings in 13 categories, including highway expenditures per mile, Interstate and primary road pavement conditions, urbanized area congestion, bridge conditions, and fatality rates. The report is based on spending and performance data state highway agencies submitted to the federal government, supplemented by data from the National Bridge Inventory and INRIX.

The report evaluates a state’s highway system spending and the condition of its roadways. The most effective and efficient state systems have low average per-mile spending and smooth pavement condition, structurally sound bridges, limited traffic congestion, and low fatality rates. But performing well in each category is challenging. Many states with low overall spending and acceptable conditions rank well as do states with above-average spending and outstanding conditions. Table ES1 summarizes recent nationwide system trends for key indicators. The U.S. saw system improvements in some categories from 2020 to 2023, but declines in several other categories.

Between 2022 and 2023, three of the four disbursement measures (capital and bridge, maintenance, and administrative) for the U.S. state-owned highway system worsened (states spent more money on their highway systems in 2023 than in 2022). The other disbursement measures improved from the previous report. Seven of the nine performance measures improved, including urban Interstate pavement condition, rural other arterial pavement condition, urban other arterial pavement condition, structurally deficient bridges, rural fatality rate, urban fatality rate, and other fatality rate. Two of the nine performance measures worsened: rural Interstate pavement condition and urbanized area congestion.

Overall, states are spending more money for a better quality, safer roadway system.

29th Annual Highway Report: Table ES1: Performance of State-Owned Highway Systems, 2020-2023

Statistic202020222023Percent change 2022-2023Percent change 2020-2023
Mileage Under State Control (Thousands)8687828235.24%-5.18%
Disbursements per Lane-Mile, Capital/Bridges, $ $41,783 $43,674 $47,3328.38%13.28%
Disbursements per Lane-Mile, Maintenance, $ $14,546 $14,819 $15,3823.80%5.75%
Disbursements per Lane-Mile, Administration, $ $5,432 $6,308 $6,7887.61%24.96%
Disbursements per Lane-Mile, Other $$21,908 $20,430 $19,928-2.46%9.04%
Consumer Price Index (1983=$1.00)$2.64$2.87 $3.066.62%15.90%
Rural Interstate, Percent Poor Condition 2.092.032.197.88%4.78%
Urban Interstate, Percent Poor Condition 4.774.554.53-0.44%-5.03%
Rural Other Principal Arterial, Percent Poor Condition 1.131.001.09-9.00%3.54%
Urban Other Principal Arterial, Percent Poor Condition14.1912.9513.07-9.27%7.89%
Urbanized Area Congestion 21.9341.3335.214.83%-60.51%
Structurally Deficient Bridges, Poor Condition 7.026.96.80-1.45%-3.13%
Rural Fatality Rate per 100 Million Vehicle-Miles, All Arterials1.31.251.18-5.60%-9.23%
Urban Fatality Rate per 100 Million Vehicle-Miles, All Arterials1.041.071.006.54%3.85%
Other Fatality Rate per 100 Million Vehicle-Miles 1.541.561.494.49%3.25%

Table ES2 summarizes system trends over the past 10 years.

Over a 10-year period, disbursements increased, pavement quality improved, congestion improved (on a statewide basis), the percentage of structurally deficient bridges decreased, and the fatality rate decreased.

Figure ES1 displays these data points in a graph.

29th Annual Highway Report: Table ES2: Trends in Highway System Performance, 2011-2023

Statistic201120122013201420152016201720182019202020222023
Mileage Under State Control (Thousands)814814815817814837N/A857781868782823
Other Disbursements per Lane-Mile, $N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A$21,908 $20,430 $47,332
Disbursements per Lane-Mile, Capital/Bridges, $$81,844*$86,153*$84,494*$90,969*$91,992*$36,681 N/A$46,805 $41,850 $41,783 $43,674 $15,382
Disbursements per Lane-Mile, Maintenance, $$25,129*$26,079*$25,996*$27,559*$28,020*$11,929 N/A$15,952 $14,570 $14,546 $14,819 $6,788
Disbursements per Lane-Mile, Administration, $$10,430*$10,579*$10,051*$ 9,980*$10,864*$4,501 N/A$6,443 $5,351 $5,432 $6,308 $19,928
Consumer Price Index (1983=1.00)$2.25 $2.32 $2.35 $2.39 $2.39 $2.42 $2.48 $2.53 $2.57 $2.64 $2.87 $3.06
Rural Interstate, Percent Poor Condition1.78*1.78*2.00*2.11*1.85*1.96N/A1.8922.092.032.19
Urban Interstate, Percent Poor Condition5.18*4.97*5.37*5.22*5.02*5.18N/A5.14.974.774.554.53
Rural Other Principal Arterial, Percent Poor Condition0.77*0.89*1.27*1.20*1.35*1.36N/A2.591.151.1311.00
Urban Other Principal Arterial, Percent Poor ConditionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A13.97N/A12.0613.5214.1912.9513.07
Urbanized Area Congestion42.15**N/A40.99**51.40**34.95**N/A34.733.4323.83**21.93**41.3335.2
Structurally Deficient Bridges, Poor ConditionN/AN/AN/AN/A9.60*9.18.867.947.467.026.96.80
Other Fatality Rate per 100 Million Vehicle-MilesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A1.541.561.18
Rural Fatality Rate per 100 Million Vehicle-Miles, All ArterialsN/AN/AN/A1.30*1.58*1.71N/A1.421.261.31.251.00
Urban Fatality Rate per 100 Million Vehicle-Miles, All ArterialsN/AN/AN/A0.67*0.70*0.77N/A0.780.821.041.071.49

*State-controlled miles were used from 2008 to 2015. From 2016 to 2022 state-controlled lane-miles were used
**A different congestion metric was used for these years

A multi-line graph showing national trends in the following categories: Capital/Bridge Disbursements per Lane-Mile, Maintenance Disbursements per Lane-Mile, Administrative Disbursements per Lane-Mile, Other Disbursements per Lane-Mile, $
Multi-line graph showing national trends in the following categories: Rural Interstate Pavement Condition, Percent Poor Condition Urban Interstate Pavement Condition, Percent Poor Condition
Rural Arterial Pavement, Percent Poor Condition Urban Arterial Pavement, Percent Poor Condition
Structurally Deficient Bridges, Poor Condition Rural Fatality Rate per 100 Million Vehicle-Miles, All Arterials
Urban Fatality Rate per 100 Million Vehicle-Miles, All Arterials Other Fatality Rate per 100 Million Vehicle-Miles
Urbanized Traffic Congestion

The top-performing states tend to be a mix of high-population and low-population states that lean both urban and rural. Very rural, low-population states may have had a slight advantage before 2019. But since the report changed to using expected disbursements and ratios, that advantage no longer exists. Four of the top five states are among the top 15 states in population. Low-population-density states such as Alabama and high-population- density states such as Connecticut both rank in the top 10.

States that struggle also have differing characteristics. The bottom five states include very rural, low-population Alaska, rural Louisiana, and two states with larger urbanized areas: California and Washington.

Several states had large increases or decreases in their ratings. Massachusetts’ ranking improved by 23 spots. However, the rankings for Arizona and Idaho both worsened by at least 10 spots.

Certain states spend significantly more than the national average. This spending may be justified if these states perform well in other categories. Unfortunately, some of the states that spend the most money are the worst performers:

  • For capital and bridge disbursements, six states have per-mile ratios higher than 1.5: Washington, Alaska, Idaho, Kansas, Indiana, and New York.
  • For maintenance disbursements, five states have per-mile ratios higher than 2.0: Washington, Indiana, Oklahoma, Vermont, and New York.
  • For administrative disbursements, six states have per-mile ratios higher than 2.0: Vermont, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Delaware, and New Hampshire.
  • For other disbursements, four states have per-mile ratios higher than 2.0: Washington, New York, California, and Wisconsin.

System performance problems in each measured category seem to be concentrated in a handful of states:

  • Approximately 44% of the rural Interstate mileage in poor condition is in just four states: Alaska, California, Colorado, and Arizona.
  • Approximately 8% of the urban Interstate mileage in poor condition is in just two states: Hawaii and Louisiana.
  • Approximately 6% of the rural arterial mileage in poor condition is located in Alaska alone.
  • Almost 40% of the urban arterial primary mileage in poor condition is in just four states: California, Nebraska, Rhode Island, and New York.
  • Automobile commuters in eight states spend more than 40 hours annually stuck in California, Georgia, Illinois, and Maryland.
  • Although a majority of states saw the percentage of structurally deficient bridges decline, nine states report more than 10% of their bridges as structurally deficient: West Virginia, Iowa, South Dakota, Rhode Island, Maine, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, Michigan, and North Dakota.
  • Three states have rural fatality rates of 1.80 per 100 million vehicle-miles traveled or higher: Alaska, South Carolina, and Hawaii.
  • Twenty-five states have urban fatality rates of 1.0 per 100 million vehicle-miles traveled or higher: New Mexico, Wyoming, Mississippi, Tennessee, Florida, Montana, Oklahoma, Arizona, Kentucky, South Carolina, Hawaii, Colorado, Nevada, Georgia, Oregon, Arkansas, West Virginia, Louisiana, Maryland, Washington, Missouri, Delaware, Alabama, California, and Texas.
  • Twenty states have other fatality rates of 1.5 per 100 million vehicle-miles traveled or higher: Kentucky, West Virginia, Arizona, Mississippi, South Carolina, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, Tennessee, Oregon, Louisiana, California, Washington, Arkansas, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Idaho, North Carolina, Montana, and Kansas.

System performance improved for some states but declined for others this year, with slightly less than half of the states (21 of 50) making progress, a similar number (23 of 50) regressing, and the rest remaining the same between 2022 and 2023.

The 10-year average of state overall performance data shows that most state highway systems are improving over time. System performance problems are concentrated in a handful of states. These states are finding it difficult to improve. There is also increasing evidence that higher-level highway systems (Interstates, other freeways, and principal arterials) are in better shape than lower-level highway systems, particularly local roads.

29th Annual Highway Report: Each State’s Highway Performance Ranking By Category

StateOverallCapital & Bridge Disbursements RatioMaintenance Disbursements RatioAdmin Disbursements RatioOther Disbursements RatioRural Interstate Pavement ConditionUrban Interstate Pavement ConditionRural Arterial Pavement ConditionUrban Arterial Pavement ConditionUrbanized Area CongestionStructurally Deficient BridgesRural Fatality RateUrban Fatality RateOther Fatality Rate
Virginia122610411211115381029626
Georgia21113247161432455233724
South Carolina313412852162524494146
North Carolina48739202320143033311633
Ohio510630171925935181461827
North Dakota630892973232424226212
Connecticut71911162211132212818181523
Alabama8131415323051148442825
Missouri9310527232713222640153016
Utah103338204181710919622123
Minnesota11324332389162232411516
Tennessee121717232141227133612204742
New Hampshire13182745205114832349417
Florida14433419132675409324620
Kentucky151523124243615102732114250
Maine16223711153241318463913
Massachusetts176153810362017464938232
Indiana1846491733826443121271911
Kansas1947213445131881932028831
Wyoming2024281314274411742846498
Arkansas21235626403825281722453537
Montana221636283029152627731434532
Michigan233919122139411634154372221
Mississippi24212812343734291226374847
Nevada25363149351022211332403829
Idaho264835144322919322219352534
Texas273422373421331239413422643
South Dakota28254044254131818948191044
Nebraska292630251612744492335131318
West Virginia30416783529367550303449
Wisconsin312410243926353944242771010
Delaware325394623N/A46612474412935
Oregon3340414037151924233415473641
Maryland342032364230433043431313214
Iowa354224261933323826149172419
Pennsylvania36720153941403737424582136
Illinois3735182732253446334441252330
Vermont383747504618443256710710
New Mexico391244731423135381317385022
New Jersey404442314017423141502716144
Arizona412912483645244220111394348
Colorado4227333318464533363516333928
Rhode Island43312918116104948374742015
Hawaii4499296N/A504840203048401
Oklahoma4538484244313945301636244445
Louisiana461425233444947422944213340
New York474546434937472847483912179
Washington4850503950432829443923343138
California4941443548474839504625362739
Alaska50494521284885016103750115

Figure ES2 shows each state’s ranking based on 2023 data.

View national trends and state-by-state performances by category:
overall
Overall
capital-bridge-disbursements-per-mile
Capital & Bridge Disbursements
maintenance-disbursements-per-mile
Maintenance Disbursements
administrative-disbursements-per-mile
Administrative Disbursements
total-disbursements-per-mile
Other Disbursements
rural-interstate-percent-poor-condition
Rural Interstate Pavement Condition
rural-other-principal-arterial-percent-narrow-lanes
Rural Other Principal Arterial Pavement Condition
urban-interstate-percent-poor-condition
Urban Interstate Pavement Condition
rural-other-principal-arterial-percent-poor-condition
Urban Other Principal Arterial Pavement Condition
urbanized-area-congestion-peak-hours-spent-in-congestion-per-auto-commuter
Urbanized Area Congestion
bridges-percent-deficient
Structurally Deficient Bridges
fatality-rate-per-100-million-vehicle-miles-of-travel
Rural Fatality Rate
fatality-rate-per-100-million-vehicle-miles-of-travel
Urban Fatality Rate
fatality-rate-per-100-million-vehicle-miles-of-travel
Other Fatality Rate