Latest
-
Utah Ranks 10th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Utah’s best rankings are rural arterial lane-width (tied for 1st), deficient bridges (3rd) and rural arterial pavement condition (8th).
-
Oklahoma Ranks 33rd Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Oklahoma’s best rankings are urbanized area congestion (18th), rural arterial lane-width (20th), and deficient bridges (23rd).
-
Georgia Ranks 18th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Georgia’s best rankings are rural arterial pavement condition (7th), deficient bridges (9th) and maintenance disbursements per mile (15th).
-
-
Kentucky Ranks 13th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Kentucky’s best rankings are administrative disbursements per mile (1st), rural arterial pavement condition (8th), total disbursements per mile (14th), capital-bridge disbursements per mile (14th) and maintenance disbursements per mile (14th).
-
New Hampshire Ranks 30th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
New Hampshire’s best rankings are rural Interstate pavement condition (tied for 1st), rural arterial lane-width (tied for 1st) and urban Interstate pavement condition (2nd).
-
-
Total Disbursements Per Mile — 23rd Annual Highway Report
The lowest disbursement per mile was in West Virginia ($35,047) and the highest was in New Jersey per mile ($2,069,020).
-
Texas Ranks 22nd Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Texas’s best rankings are deficient bridges (10th), administrative disbursements per mile (11th), and rural arterial pavement condition (16th).
-
Wyoming Ranks 8th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Wyoming’s best rankings are urbanized area congestion (1st), rural arterial lane-width (tied for 1st), total disbursements per mile (9th) and maintenance disbursements per mile (9th).
-
Michigan Ranks 32nd Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Michigan’s best rankings are fatality rate (19th), rural arterial pavement condition (19th) and administrative disbursements per mile (26th).
-
New York Ranks 45th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
New York’s best rankings are fatality rate (8th), rural arterial pavement condition (34th), and administrative disbursements per mile (40th).
-
Ohio Ranks 26th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Ohio’s best rankings are rural arterial pavement condition (17th), fatality rate (18th) and deficient bridges (20th).
-
-
23rd Annual Highway Report
Ranking each state's highway system in 11 categories, including highway spending, pavement and bridge conditions, traffic congestion, and fatality rates.
-
Illinois Ranks 28th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Illinois’s best rankings are rural Interstate pavement condition (tied for 1st), rural arterial pavement condition (3rd) and urban Interstate pavement condition (5th).
-
Mississippi Ranks 11th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Mississippi’s best rankings are maintenance disbursements per mile (4th), and rural arterial lane-width (10h) and total disbursements per mile (12th).
-
New Jersey Ranks 50th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
New Jersey’s best rankings are rural arterial lane-width (tied for 1st), fatality rate (4th), and rural Interstate pavement condition (31st).
