Get weekly updates from Reason.
Today's Top Topics
July 26, 2014
Orlando Sentinel interview with Robert Poole
In an interview with the Orlando Sentinel, Reason Director of Transportation Policy Robert Poole discusses the reasons the Highway Trust Fund is in trouble and why a user fee based on miles driven, rather than gas consumption, is the safe and sustainable solution.
Sacramento considering social impact investment
"Pay-for-success" isn't exactly what comes to mind when thinking of how California government spends tax dollars, so we take special notice when legislators in Sacramento pass bills based on the concept.
Earlier this year the Senate passed - and the Assembly is now considering - Senate Bill 593, which would create a new "pay-for-success" pilot program for social impact partnerships. The idea is for the government to tap private sector dollars and expertise to advance new, evidence-based approaches to better address issues like child abuse and neglect, education, homelessness and recidivism.
PPPs offer better cost control, improved performance, increased accountability and reduced taxpayer risk
Over the past several decades, state prison populations have skyrocketed, and so too have corrections expenditures. In an attempt to control costs while maintaining high levels of service, a number of states have begun to form public-private partnerships (PPPs) in correctional health care by contracting out some or all of their prison health services. This paper gives a brief overview of what the current state correctional health care market looks like, and explores the various options states have pursued to provide their inmates with health care while incarcerated.
Massive penalties turn imperiled species into unwanted financial liabilties
The apparent sighting of a single ocean-going steelhead trout in the recently restored Malibu Lagoon is a rare, but welcome, piece of good news for the Endangered Species Act. Unfortunately, the steelhead trout's potentially positive outlook in Malibu is the exception, rather than the rule.
Abandoning the California rule would give governments flexibility to deal with changing circumstances
The Contract Clause, which prohibits states from making laws impairing the obligation of contracts, is commonly used to challenge state and local public pension reform efforts. Courts in California, and in other states following California’s example, follow a particularly strict rule: they hold not only that public employees are entitled to the pension they’ve accrued by their work so far, but also that they’re entitled to keep earning a pension (as long they continue in their job) according to rules that are at least as generous. Thus, in states where the California rule applies, one can’t constitutionally increase employee contribution rates or reduce cost-of-living allowances. There’s nothing legally invalid about the California rule. But the rule is unsound as a policy matter.
High taxes and stringent regulations make California undesirable for many people
Simply put, California: I just can't take it anymore. All the taxing, spending and regulating hasn't led to a better quality of life. Maybe someday the state will once again value freedom and the entrepreneurial spirit. I hope so. But in the meantime, my family and I, like so many other successful Californians, are outta here.
Did the Supreme Court Just Signal Mandatory Union Dues Will Become a Thing of the Past for Public Sector Employees?
A possible future overruling of the decision that allowed compulsory dues to public-employee unions for non-political purposes
The bare holding of the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion in Harris v. Quinn is fairly narrow. But the opinion may be more important than its bare holding, to the extent that it portends a possible future overruling of Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, the 1977 decision that allowed compulsory dues to public-employee unions for non-political purposes.
The City of Phoenix Employee Retirement System is facing a $1.5 billion dollar unfunded liability and is operating with unrealistic actuarial assumptions that underestimate future taxpayer costs. Further, the 2013 reform initiative requires future employees to contribute unsustainably high percentages of their salaries to retirement savings, making retention very challenging. This report analyzes a proposed reform to the system that would address these challenges and finds it would reduce taxpayer liabilities, eliminate retention risk, save taxpayers $394.7 million by conservative measures, and possibly reduce taxpayer costs as much as $1.6 billion over the next 25 years.
- Union Negotiations in West Coast Ports Threaten the National Economy (7/25)
- Streetcars are the Wrong Way to go on Columbia Pike (7/24)
- Poll Shows Voters Support State-based Sage Grouse Conservation (7/24)
- Lucy Burns Institute Launches Policypedia (7/22)
- How to Structure a Good Defined Contribution Plan (7/22)
Latest From Reason
Long delays and legal maladministration are further reason to dump capital punishment.
Obesity rates may be leveling off or even falling.
If teachers believe they aren't making what they're worth, let's free them from union constraints and let them find out what the job market has to offer.