Policy Study

Deficient Bridges — 23rd Annual Highway Report

Percent of Bridges in Deficient Condition
2017 Annual Highway Report

[show-map id=’7′]
1 to 10 Very Good 11 to 20 Good 21 to 30 Average 31 to 40 Bad 41 to 50 Very Bad 

Federal law mandates the uniform inspection of all bridges for structural and functional adequacy at least every two years; bridges rated “deficient” are eligible for federal repair dollars. The National Bridge Inventory (NBI) is the source of the bridge data below, although we use summaries provided in Better Roads (see Appendix). Since the NBI contains some recent inspections and some as old as two years, the age of the “average” inspection is about one year old. So, a “December 2016” summary from the NBI would represent, on average, bridge condition as of 2015.

The condition of the nation’s highway bridges in 2015 worsened slightly from 2013, the last time this assessment was completed. Of the 603,366 highway bridges reported, 130,623 (about 21.65%) were rated deficient for 2015 (Table 15, Percent of Bridges in Deficient Condition, 2015, Figure 6). This represents a 5.9% worsening over 2013 when 124,265 of 607,885 (20.44%) were rated as deficient.

Arizona reported the lowest percentage of total deficient (functionally obsolete and structurally deficient) bridges, 9.01%, while Rhode Island reported the highest, 52.01%. Over half the states (26) reported at least some improvement in the percentage of deficient bridges from 2013 to 2015, with Pennsylvania and Wyoming seeing the most improvement (3.4 and 2.7 percentage points, respectively). One state reported essentially no change. Of the 23 states that reported a higher percentage of deficient bridges, nine saw increases of more than two percentage points. Two of these nine, California and Ohio, did not include functionally obsolete bridges in their deficient bridge totals for 2013. As a result, these two states saw double-digit increases, but returned to their historical averages. One other state, Nevada, also saw a double-digit increase in deficient bridges of 10.9 percentage points.

Percent of Bridges in Deficient Condition
RankNamePercent
1Arizona9.01
2Minnesota10.26
3Utah11.69
4New Mexico13.92
5Wisconsin14.11
6Kansas15.12
7Illinois15.59
8Colorado15.91
9Georgia15.96
10Texas16
11Florida16.27
12Tennessee16.95
13Delaware18.15
14Montana18.17
15North Dakota18.24
16Indiana 18.71
17Idaho19.11
18Alaska19.35
19Mississippi19.68
20Ohio20.19
21South Carolina20.19
22Wyoming20.42
23Oklahoma 20.76
24Arkansas21.06
25Nebraska21.18
26Alabama21.36
27Nevada22.08
28California22.88
29Oregon22.95
30Missouri23.05
31South Dakota23.06
32Maryland23.76
33Michigan24.96
34Iowa25.13
35Washington25.59
36Virginia25.79
37Vermont25.8
38New Hampshire26.69
39Louisiana27.38
40Kentucky28.28
41North Carolina28.55
42New Jersey32.17
43Maine32.84
44Connecticut34.18
45Pennsylvania34.67
46Massachusetts35.79
47West Virginia37.01
48New York37.67
49Hawaii42.72
50Rhode Island52.01
Weighted Average21.65
View national trends and state-by-state performances by category:
overall
Overall
total-disbursements-per-mile
Total Disbursements Per Mile
capital-bridge-disbursements-per-mile
Capital & Bridge Disbursements Per Mile
maintenance-disbursements-per-mile
Maintenance Disbursements Per Mile
administrative-disbursements-per-mile
Administrative Disbursements Per Mile
rural-interstate-percent-poor-condition
Rural Interstate Pavement Condition
rural-other-principal-arterial-percent-narrow-lanes
Rural Arterial Pavement Condition
rural-other-principal-arterial-percent-poor-condition
Narrow Rural Arterial Lanes
urban-interstate-percent-poor-condition
Urban Interstate Pavement Condition
urbanized-area-congestion-peak-hours-spent-in-congestion-per-auto-commuter
Urbanized Area Congestion*
bridges-percent-deficient
Deficient Bridges
fatality-rate-per-100-million-vehicle-miles-of-travel
Fatality Rates