-
Amicus Brief: SEC v. Romeril
The condition that the Securities & Exchange Commission imposed on Barry Romeril’s settlement of its claims infringes on the First Amendment rights of all who wish to hear Romeril’s story.
-
Amicus Brief: McDonald v. Firth
Subjecting mandatory bar associations to “the same constitutional rule” as public sector unions now means subjecting them to exacting scrutiny that reveals unjustifiable violations of attorneys’ First Amendment rights by the bar associations.
-
Amicus Brief: Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina
The Equal Protection Clause prohibits the government from denying “any person . . . the equal protection of the laws.”
-
Amicus Brief: John K. Maciver Institute For Public Policy v. Tony Evers
The Constitution’s guarantee of freedom of the press does not assume that the press will be “objective,” and to allow the government power to draw legal lines around the press based on the government’s determination of “objectivity” is unworkable in principle.
-
Amicus Brief: Gary E. Albright v. United States of America
The Federal Circuit violated foundational principles of federalism when it refused to certify a novel issue of state law to the state’s highest court.
-
Amicus Brief: Lange v. California
Permitting police officers categorically to effect a warrantless home entry during a misdemeanor pursuit will have deleterious consequences.
-
Amicus Brief: Terkel v. Centers for Disease Control
The eviction moratorium is unconstitutional and denies access to state courts, intrudes on state judiciaries, and distorts political accountability.
-
Amicus Brief: Mark Ringland v. United States of America
The private-search doctrine does not appropriately safeguard the Fourth Amendment interests at issue when the search involves digital mediums like email accounts.
-
Amicus Brief: Students For Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President And Fellows Of Harvard College
Neither the Constitution nor Title VI countenances racial preferences in admissions decisions.
-
Amicus Brief: FDRLST v. NLRB
If you can be haled into court and found in violation of federal law on the basis of satire, sarcasm, or hyperbole, everyone will self-censor their humor, to the detriment of freewheeling discourse.
-
Amicus Brief: AFP v. Becerra
The Ninth Circuit misconstrued the Supreme Court’s precedents and gave California free rein to demand donor information for any charity in the nation that operates in the state.
-
Amicus Brief: Appeal No. 29546 Thom v. Barnett
No state that has eliminated criminal and civil penalties for either the medicinal or general adult use of marijuana has reverted to re-criminalizing marijuana, even in part.
-
Amicus Brief: Bridge Aina Le‘a, LLC v. State of Hawaii Land Use Commission
This court should grant the petition for certiorari to safeguard the landowner’s fundamental right to a jury’s determination of the effect of the government’s taking and to reaffirm the Seventh Amendment guarantee of right to trial by jury.
-
Amicus Brief: CIC Services v. Internal Revenue Service
"This court should reverse the decision below and clarify that the AIA does not bar pre-enforcement challenges to the validity of tax rules under the APA."
-
Amicus Brief: American Society of Journalists v. Xavier Becerra
This court should reverse the district court, join its sister circuits in affirming that Reed is the law of the land, and grant journalists their day in court.
-
Amicus Brief: Higginson v. Becerra
The right to vote, like the rights guaranteed by the Equal Protection Clause, is an individual right. Vote dilution claims, however, treat people simply as members of their racial group.
-
Amicus Brief: Jessop v. City of Fresno
"Now, not only can officials seize and retain personal property with little judicial oversight under the guise of civil asset forfeiture; law enforcement also can outright steal personal property for their own use with impunity and without fear of civil liability. "
-
Amicus Brief: Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard
Harvard’s discrimination against Asian American applicants prolongs a long history of discrimination against Asian Americans in the United States. The judgment of the district court should be reversed.
