Latest
-
Maryland Ranks 40th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Maryland’s best rankings are fatality rate (9th), rural arterial lane-width (17th), rural Interstate pavement condition (26th) and rural arterial pavement condition (26th).
-
Alaska Ranks 48th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Alaska’s best rankings are urbanized area congestion (8th), deficient bridges (18th) and rural arterial lane-width (19th).
-
Nevada Ranks 20th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Nevada’s best rankings are urban Interstate pavement condition (11th), rural Interstate pavement condition (15th) and maintenance disbursements per mile (16th).
-
North Dakota Ranks 1st Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
North Dakota’s best rankings are maintenance disbursements per mile (3rd), urban Interstate pavement condition (3rd), rural Interstate pavement condition (4th) and urbanized area congestion (4th).
-
-
Florida Ranks 35th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Florida’s best rankings are rural arterial pavement condition (2nd), rural Interstate pavement condition (5th) and urban Interstate pavement condition (6th).
-
New Mexico Ranks 24th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
New Mexico’s best rankings are maintenance disbursements per mile (2nd), deficient bridges (4th) and capital-bridge disbursements per mile (7th).
-
Connecticut Ranks 46th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Connecticut’s best rankings are fatality rate (6th), rural arterial lane-width (14th), and urban Interstate pavement condition (26th).
-
-
California Ranks 42nd Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
California’s best rankings are rural arterial lane-width (1st), fatality rate (14th), and deficient bridges (28th).
-
South Dakota Ranks 3rd Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
South Dakota’s best rankings are total disbursements per mile (4th), maintenance disbursements per mile (5th) and urbanized area congestion (5th).
-
Nebraska Ranks 4th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Nebraska’s best rankings are administrative disbursements per mile (2nd), rural arterial lane-width (9th), total disbursements per mile (10th), capital-bridge disbursements per mile (10th) and urbanized area congestion (10th).
-
Pennsylvania Ranks 41st Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Pennsylvania’s best rankings are fatality rate (25th), rural Interstate pavement condition (27th), capital-bridge disbursements per mile (28th) and administrative disbursements per mile (28th).
-
Massachusetts Ranks 44th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Massachusetts’s best rankings are fatality rate (1st), rural arterial lane-width (tied for 1st), and urban Interstate pavement condition (35th).
-
Missouri Ranks 9th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Missouri’s best rankings are administrative disbursements per mile (3rd), capital-bridge disbursements per mile (3rd) and total disbursements per mile (5th).
-
-
Iowa Ranks 15th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Iowa’s best rankings are urbanized area congestion (3rd), administrative disbursements per mile (12th), and fatality rate (17th).
-
Rhode Island Ranks 49th Overall in Highway Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
Rhode Island’s best rankings are fatality rate (2nd), urbanized area congestion (29th) and rural arterial lane-width (31st).
