Public education at a crossroads: Math and reading outcomes (low-income students only) 
Photo 134950192 © Alexander Oganezov | Dreamstime.com

K-12 Education Spending Spotlight

Public education at a crossroads: Math and reading outcomes (low-income students only) 

Between 2003 and 2019, the average U.S. 4th grade NAEP math score for free and reduced-price lunch eligible students increased by seven points.

This section of the Public Education at a Crossroads study examines the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reading and math scores for low-income 4th and 8th-grade students. Importantly, NAEP data obtained from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) were reported as decimal values. State rankings and calculated growth scores were determined using these unrounded figures. As such, there are no ties in the rankings, and some growth scores aren’t identical to the difference between the rounded figures presented.

4th Grade Reading and Math NAEP (Free and Reduced Priced Lunch Eligible Students Only)

Between 2003 and 2019, the average U.S. 4th grade NAEP reading score for free and reduced-priced lunch (FRL) eligible students increased by six points, from 201 to 207. The three highest-growth states during this time were Nevada, Mississippi, and California, while the three lowest-growth states were Delaware, West Virginia, and Vermont.

In 2019, the highest-scoring states were Florida, Wyoming, and Mississippi, while the three lowest-scoring states were Alaska, Alabama, and New Mexico.

Table 21 summarizes 4th-grade NAEP reading results for FRL-eligible students.

Table 21: 4th Grade FRL NAEP Reading Score Growth (2003-2019)
Growth Rank2019 RankState20032019Growth
United States2012076
17Nevada19221119
23Mississippi19721518
338California19120514
41Florida20521611
522Pennsylvania1982079
647Arizona1942028
735Hawaii1972068
837Illinois1972058
946Louisiana1952027
1026Georgia2002077
118New Jersey2032107
1248New Mexico1952016
1349Alabama1931996
1439Maryland1992056
1533Rhode Island2002065
1632Michigan2012065
1715Oklahoma2042085
1845Tennessee1982024
1910Indiana2052094
209Ohio2062104
214Massachusetts2102134
226Idaho2072114
2323Arkansas2042073
242Wyoming2122153
2521Virginia2052083
265Kentucky2092122
2712Nebraska2072092
2818North Carolina2062082
2917Utah2062082
3016New Hampshire2062082
3142South Carolina2022042
3214Colorado2072082
3340Minnesota2032051
3427Oregon2052071
3531Texas2052061
3636Connecticut2052050
3719Montana2082080
3830Kansas2062060
3925Missouri208207-1
4029New York208206-1
4128Washington208206-2
4243Wisconsin205204-2
4324Iowa209207-2
4413North Dakota210209-2
4520South Dakota210208-2
4650Alaska192189-3
4711Maine213209-4
4834Vermont214206-8
4941West Virginia212204-8
5044Delaware212202-9

4th Grade FRL NAEP Reading Score Growth (2003-2019)

Between 2003 and 2019, the average U.S. 4th grade NAEP math score for FRL-eligible students increased by seven points, from 222 to 229.

The three highest-growth states during this time were Mississippi, Florida, and Nevada, while the three lowest-growth states were Kansas, West Virginia, and South Dakota. In 2019, the highest-scoring states were Florida, Mississippi, and Wyoming, while the three lowest-scoring states were Alabama, Alaska, and West Virginia.

Table 22 summarizes 4th-grade NAEP math results for FRL-eligible students.

Table 22: 4th Grade FRL NAEP Math Score Growth (2003-2019)
Growth Rank2019 RankState20032019Growth
United States2222297
12Mississippi21623620
21Florida22223917
323Nevada21622913
424Rhode Island21722912
534Illinois21622611
636Hawaii21622610
716Kentucky22023010
88Nebraska22223310
915New Jersey22123110
1042Tennessee21622610
116Virginia22523410
1235New Mexico21722610
135Indiana2252359
1440Arizona2172269
1546Maryland2162248
1631Georgia2192278
1718Oklahoma2232307
1827Connecticut2202277
1947California2162237
2010Utah2252327
2128Pennsylvania2202277
2250Alabama2132207
2343Colorado2192256
2419Ohio2242306
257Idaho2272336
264Texas2292356
2721Missouri2242305
2812Minnesota2262315
2939Arkansas2212265
3038Wisconsin2212265
3145Louisiana2202245
3214Massachusetts2262315
3344Michigan2202244
3411Montana2272324
359New Hampshire2292323
363Wyoming2332363
3713North Dakota2282313
3833Delaware2252272
3920Maine2282302
4025Washington2262282
4141New York2252261
4229Oregon2262271
4317North Carolina2292301
4432South Carolina2262271
4522Vermont2292291
4649Alaska2202200
4730Iowa2272270
4837South Dakota227226-1
4948West Virginia225222-3
5026Kansas231228-3

4th Grade FRL NAEP Math Score Growth (2003-2019)

8th Grade Reading and Math NAEP (Free and Reduced Priced Lunch Eligible Students Only)

Between 2003 and 2019, the average U.S. 8th-grade NAEP reading score for FRL-eligible students increased by three points, going from 247 to 250.

The three highest-growth states during this time were California, Florida, and Connecticut, while the three lowest-growth states were South Dakota, North Dakota, and Virginia. In 2019, the highest-scoring states were Vermont, Maine, and Indiana, while the three lowest-scoring states were Alaska, Alabama, and New Mexico. Table 23 summarizes 8th-grade NAEP reading results for FRL-eligible students.

Table 23: 8th Grade FRL NAEP Reading Score Growth (2003-2019)
Growth Rank2019 RankState20032019Growth
United States2472503
139California23724810
25Florida2452559
38Connecticut2452549
414Georgia2432529
513Wisconsin2442528
633Nevada2422498
73Indiana2482558
835Arizona2412487
940Maryland2422475
1045Hawaii2402455
1118New Jersey2462515
1232Louisiana2452495
1319Mississippi2462504
146Utah2512543
1521Michigan2472503
1637Tennessee2452483
1748New Mexico2412443
1831North Carolina2472493
1925Pennsylvania2472503
2010Massachusetts2512533
2116Illinois2492512
2249Alabama2412432
2334South Carolina2472492
241Vermont2552571
2523New York2492501
2630Washington2482491
274Idaho2542551
2850Alaska2392400
2943Texas2462460
307Oregon2542540
3127Colorado2502500
3228Arkansas2502500
3347Rhode Island2452450
3426Ohio251250-1
3541Minnesota248247-1
3624Oklahoma251250-1
3717Kansas253251-1
3812Wyoming255253-3
392Maine258255-3
4015Missouri255251-3
4129Nebraska253250-3
4238West Virginia252248-4
4311Kentucky257253-4
4422New Hampshire255250-5
459Montana258253-5
4646Delaware250245-5
4742Iowa252246-6
4844Virginia252246-6
4920North Dakota259250-9
5036South Dakota261248-13

8th Grade FRL NAEP Reading Score Growth (2003-2019)

Between 2003 and 2019, the average U.S. 8th-grade NAEP math score for FRL-eligible students increased by seven points, going from 259 to 266. The three highest-growth states during this time were Mississippi, Georgia, and Tennessee, while the three lowest-growth states were North Dakota, Montana, and Delaware.

In 2019, the highest-scoring states were Wyoming, Massachusetts, and Indiana, while the three lowest-scoring states were Alabama, Rhode Island, and Delaware. Table 24 summarizes 8th-grade NAEP math results for FRL-eligible students.

Table 24: 8th Grade FRL NAEP Math Score Growth (2003-2019)
Growth Rank2019 RankState20032019Growth
United States2592667
128Mississippi25126716
231Georgia25326513
340Tennessee25026313
416Illinois25626913
521New Jersey25626812
611Arizona25827012
741California25126212
825Florida25626711
92Massachusetts26127211
1013Wisconsin25926911
1145New Mexico2522629
1236Nevada2542649
1342Hawaii2542628
149Virginia2612708
1535Pennsylvania2572658
1634Michigan2572658
1750Alabama2462547
1822Oklahoma2602677
1937Arkansas2562637
203Indiana2662726
2144Louisiana2562626
228Texas2642706
2326Kentucky2612676
2419North Carolina2632685
2547Maryland2552605
2612Nebraska2652705
275Idaho2672714
2823Missouri2632674
2930New York2622664
3033Colorado2622653
3149Rhode Island2532573
324Vermont2682723
3338Connecticut2602633
3418Washington2652683
357New Hampshire2682702
361Wyoming2712732
3732Ohio2632652
3843West Virginia2612621
3924Oregon2662671
4027Iowa2662671
4129Utah2662660
4220Maine2682680
4339South Carolina2632630
4446Alaska2602600
4514Kansas270269-1
4610Minnesota271270-1
476South Dakota272270-1
4848Delaware261259-2
4915Montana273269-4
5017North Dakota274268-6

8th Grade FRL NAEP Math Score Growth (2003-2019)

Full Study — Public Education at a Crossroads: A Comprehensive Look at K-12 Resources and Outcomes