How much teachers contribute to their retirement benefits in each state
Reason Foundation

Commentary

How much teachers contribute to their retirement benefits in each state

Most states require teachers to pay between 5% and 12% of their pay, with the employer paying what remains to cover the benefit and pension system's debt.

The vast majority of public school teachers are enrolled in defined-benefit pension plans, which require regular contributions from both employees and employers. These pension contributions are deducted automatically from teachers’ paychecks as a percentage of their total pay, so these contribution rates have a notable impact on their overall compensation packages.

Educators who are required to contribute higher rates to their pensions will see more drawn from their paychecks and, consequently, less in the amount of pay they are taking home. 

A comparison of the required teacher pension contribution rates for each state in 2024 shows a number of issues that public teachers and government policymakers should be aware of.

Not all public pension benefits are exactly the same. Each pension plan offers a guaranteed lifetime benefit that is calculated using the employee’s final average salary, their years of service, and a unique multiplier that determines the ultimate value of the benefit. Some states offer benefits that are more generous than others, and most are gated behind vesting requirements that can vary significantly from one plan to another.

States also differ in how they balance the required contributions to pay for promised pension benefits between the teacher and the employer (usually a combination of the governing body and the school district). Some states like Arizona and Nevada balance these pension contributions 50/50, with the employer always paying the same amount as the teacher. Other states like Utah have the employer pay nearly all the costs of the pension.

Most states require teachers to pay between 5% and 12% of their pay, with the employer paying what remains to cover the benefit and whatever debt payments are needed to eliminate unfunded liabilities.

Since most state-run pensions operate with significant pension debt—aggregate state pension debt is estimated to be $1.3 trillion—nearly all employer rates greatly exceed the contribution amounts teachers are paying.

StatePlan NameTeacher Contribution RateDoes Not Participate in Social Security2023 Funded Ratio
AlabamaTeachers’ Retirement System of Alabama6.20%63%
AlaskaState of Alaska Teachers’ Retirement System8.00%X76%
ArizonaArizona State Retirement System12.14%74%
ArkansasArkansas Teacher Retirement System7.00%81%
CaliforniaCalifornia State Teachers’ Retirement System10.21%X88%
ColoradoColorado Public Employee Retirement Association-School Division11.00%X64%
ConnecticutConnecticut State Teachers’ Retirement System7.00%X58%
DelawareDelaware State Employees’ Pension Plan5.00%86%
FloridaFlorida Retirement System3.00%82%
GeorgiaTeachers Retirement System of Georgia6.00%75%
HawaiiEmployees’ Retirement System of the State of Hawaii8.00%62%
IdahoPublic Employee Retirement System of Idaho7.18%84%
IllinoisTeachers’ Retirement System of The State of Illinois9.00%X45%
IndianaIndiana State Teachers’ Retirement Fund3.00%72%
IowaIowa Public Employees’ Retirement System6.29%90%
KansasKansas Public Employees Retirement System6.00%72%
KentuckyTeachers’ Retirement System of the State of Kentucky14.75%X57%
LouisianaLouisiana State Teachers Retirement System8.00%X74%
MaineMaine Public Employees Retirement System – State and Teacher Retirement Program7.65%X86%
MarylandMaryland State Retirement and Pension System – Teachers Combined System7.00%75%
MassachusettsMassachusetts Teachers’ Retirement System11.00%X59%
MichiganMichigan Public School Employees’ Retirement System7.00%62%
MinnesotaTeachers Retirement Association of Minnesota7.75%76%
MississippiPublic Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi9.00%54%
MissouriPublic School Retirement System of Missouri14.50%X85%
MontanaTeachers’ Retirement System of Montana8.15%72%
NebraskaNebraska Public Employees Retirement System – School Employees Plan9.78%75%
NevadaPublic Employees’ Retirement System of Nevada – Regular Employees Plan17.50%X76%
New HampshireNew Hampshire Retirement System7.00%67%
New JerseyTeachers’ Pension and Annuity Fund of New Jersey7.50%37%
New MexicoEducational Retirement Board of New Mexico10.70%63%
New YorkNew York State Teachers’ Retirement System5.75%99%
North CarolinaTeachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System of North Carolina6.00%84%
North DakotaNorth Dakota Teachers’ Fund for Retirement11.75%69%
OhioOhio State Teachers Retirement System14.00%X78%
OklahomaTeachers’ Retirement System of Oklahoma7.00%73%
OregonOregon Public Employees Retirement System6.00%82%
PennsylvaniaPublic School Employees’ Retirement System of Pennsylvania9.00%62%
Rhode IslandRhode Island Employees’ Retirement System Plan3.75%X64%
South CarolinaSouth Carolina Retirement System7.00%58%
South DakotaSouth Dakota Retirement System6.00%100%
TennesseeTennesee State and Teachers’ Retirement Plan7.00%107%
TexasTeacher Retirement System of Texas8.25%X73%
UtahUtah Public Employees Noncontributory Retirement System0.70%98%
VermontState Teachers’ Retirement System of Vermont6.00%57%
VirginiaVirginia Retirement System5.00%83%
WashingtonWashington Teachers Plan 28.06%101%
West VirginiaWest Virginia Teachers’ Retirement System6.00%80%
WisconsinWisconsin Retirement System6.90%103%
WyomingWyoming Public Employees Pension Plan9.25%82%

Whether teachers in a particular state participate in Social Security also warrants attention. Some states have declined to have their employees in the federal program and are therefore expected to adopt higher pension benefits and, consequently, higher contributions to make up the difference.

While the percentage of pay that teachers contribute to their pensions is merely a part of a bigger retirement plan structure, it is useful for teachers to examine and compare the deductions they will see on their paychecks.

It is also useful for policymakers to see what states around the country are requiring of their educators as they cooperate to tackle adequate funding and the growing struggles with public pension debt.

Notes on the data

The 2024 pension contribution rates were gathered from financial documents, educational materials, and the websites of state-run retirement plans for teachers.

Many states have several tiers of benefits based on a teacher’s hire date or other factors. This analysis only presents the contribution rates of the latest tier, or the tier in which new hires will be members. It does not include contribution rates from tiers that are still active but no longer available to new hires.

The funded ratios display the pension system’s ratio of assets to the estimated pension liability. These figures come from 2023 financial reports. Since 2023 figures were not available, the figures were estimated for Michigan, Nebraska, Oregon, and Wisconsin.

Additional notes on specific states:

  • Indiana: Teachers are offered a hybrid plan in which employees contribute to the defined contribution (DC) portion and the employer pays into the pension portion. This analysis displays the DC contribution obligation for teachers.
  • Kansas: Teachers are enrolled in a cash balance plan, which guarantees defined returns but is different from a defined benefit plan.
  • Tennessee: Teachers have a hybrid plan in which 5% of their contributions go to the defined benefit (DB) portion and 2% goes to a DC.
  • Utah: The tier 2 pension benefit offered to Utah teachers has the employer pay 10% pay into the DB fund, with employees covering any necessary costs that exceed that amount. Up until 2024, this has resulted in no required contributions from teachers. With pension costs continuing to grow, teachers are now seeing deductions from their paychecks for the first time.
  • Vermont: Teacher contributions are set on a progressive scale based on salary. This analysis uses the lowest contribution requirement (6%) for any salary below $40 thousand.
  • Washington: Employers offer a defined benefit or hybrid plan. There is 50/50 cost-sharing in the DB plan. In the hybrid, the employer pays all DB costs, and teachers cover all DC contributions, ranging from 5-15% of pay. 
  • Wyoming: While teachers are required to contribute 9.25% of their pay, the employer has agreed to pick up 5.57%, meaning educators are only obligated to pay 3.68% of their salary for their pension.

Stay in Touch with Our Pension Experts

Reason Foundation’s Pension Integrity Project has helped policymakers in states like Arizona, Colorado, Michigan, and Montana implement substantive pension reforms. Our monthly newsletter highlights the latest actuarial analysis and policy insights from our team.


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.