-
People of the State of California v. Jessica Claire McElfresh
Amicus Brief to the Superior court of the State of California
-
Abbott v. Pastides, Case No. 17-1853
Amicus Brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
-
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Case No. 16-111
Amicus Brief to the Supreme Court of the United States
-
-
-
City of Bloomfield, New Mexico v. Jane Felix, B.N. Coone, Case No. 17-60
Amicus Brief to the Supreme Court of the United States
-
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Joe Mansky, Case No. 16-1435
Amicus Brief to the Supreme Court of the United States
-
616 Croft Ave. v. City of West Hollywood, Case No. 16-1137
Amicus Brief to the Supreme Court of the United States
-
Bay Point Properties v. Mississippi Transportation Commission
Allowing Mississippi’s scheme to stand will invite other states to adopt similar legislative schemes by which states may redefine private property.
-
Todd S. Farha vs. United States of America
Brief of Amici Curiae Reason Foundation and Cato Institute in support of petitioner
-
Niang and Stigers v. Carroll Appeal No. 16-3968
Amicus Brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
-
USA v. Randy Joe Metcalf, Appeal No. 16-4006
Brief of Amici Curiae Reason Foundation, et al.
-
Lee v. Tam
This brief urges the Supreme Court "to let people judge for themselves what’s derogatory."
-
William Hatch v. United States of America, Case No. 13-6765
Amicus Brief to the Supreme Court of the United States
-
United States v. Peter Clay, Amicus Brief, United States Court Of Appeals For The Eleventh Circuit
Brief for amici curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Reason Foundation, Washington Legal Foundation, Cato Institute, 12 criminal and business law professors in support of defendant-appellant Todd S. Farha’s petition for rehearing
-
Brott v. United States of America, 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
Amicus curiae brief in support of plaintiffs
-
Joe Sanfelippo Cabs, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee; Amicus Brief, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Considering the secondary market value of taxi licenses to be a property right would inhibit policies to increase competition in taxi markets, at great cost to consumers and would-be providers in the taxi industry.
-
Murr v. Wisconsin, Supreme Court
Amicus curiae brief in support of petitioners
