Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe (R-Ok.) deftly skewers climate alarmists in this speech given on the Senate floor last week:
For these groups, the issue of catastrophic global warming is not just a favored fundraising tool. In truth, it’s more fundamental than that. Put simply, man-induced global warming is an article of religious faith. Therefore contending that its central tenets are flawed is, to them, heresy of the most despicable kind. Furthermore, scientists who challenge its tenets are attacked, sometimes personally, for blindly ignoring the so-called “scientific consensus.” But that’s not all: because of their skeptical views, they are contemptuously dismissed for being “out of the mainstream.” This is, it seems to me, highly ironic: aren’t scientists supposed to be non-conforming and question consensus? Nevertheless, it’s not hard to read between the lines: “skeptic” and “out of the mainstream” are thinly veiled code phrases, meaning anyone who doubts alarmist orthodoxy is, in short, a quack.
I have insisted all along that the climate change debate should be based on fundamental principles of science, not religion. Ultimately, I hope, it will be decided by hard facts and dataÃ¢â?¬â??and by serious scientists committed to the principles of sound science. Instead of censoring skeptical viewpoints, as my alarmist friends favor, these scientists must be heard, and I will do my part to make sure that they are heard.”
Senator Inhofe goes on to cover everything from recent natural disasters, the debunking of the famed “hockey stick” graph of Northern Hemisphere temperatures, the recent Buenos Aires climate change negotiations, and Michael Crichton’s new book, “State of Fear.” Read the whole thing. And check out this article by CEI’s James Horner, who elaborates on Senator Inhofe’s speech as it relates to the European Union’s climate change agenda.