Key Stakeholders Agree It’s Time to Reform the New Mexico’s Largest Public Pension System
ID 39053935 © Vladislav Gajic |


Key Stakeholders Agree It’s Time to Reform the New Mexico’s Largest Public Pension System

The proposed reforms to PERA are a great first step toward addressing the debt currently looming over the state budget.

This column was co-written by Paul Gessing, president of New Mexico’s Rio Grande Foundation.

In the weeks leading up to the 2020 legislative session, an all too rare alignment has occurred in New Mexico — the governor, legislators from both parties, labor and taxpayer representatives, plan managers and other stakeholders in Santa Fe all agreed that it is time to reform the state’s largest public pension system.

New Mexico’s Public Employees Retirement Association has amassed over $6 billion in unfunded pension liabilities and has become vulnerable to volatile investment markets. The governor’s PERA Solvency Task Force recognized the growing unfunded liability problem and acknowledged the need to fully pay for state promises by making PERA a fully funded system within 25 years a top priority. The resulting task force recommendations mainly increase contributions and address a broken cost-of-living adjustment policy that served more as annual pension bonuses than it did as protection against inflation.

The proposed reforms are a great first step toward addressing the debt currently looming over the state budget. However, there remains more work to do, as the current legislation would do little to address the systemic assumptions and policies that led to debt accumulating in the first place, mainly a lack of protection against market volatility, overly optimistic actuarial assumptions and letting the political process — not actuarial math — determine annual pension contribution rates.

Consider that while passing the proposed legislation would generate a one-time reduction in unfunded liabilities by an estimated $700 million, in fiscal year 2019 alone, the unfunded liability increased by $600 million due mostly to underperforming investments and insufficient contributions.

While the legislature continues to reject plan actuary recommendations and rely on bureaucratic statutes to determine its contribution to PERA, assets will continue to depend on high market returns to make up for subtle dips and losses. The debt is also still likely to grow due to PERA maintaining market assumptions that even PERA forecast only gives a 60 percent chance of coming to fruition. Some more long-term market forecast view PERA’s chances at less than 50/50.

If there’s a future where market returns may not be as rosy in the past, we need to plan for it now by saving more and adopting more conservative assumptions. Otherwise, PERA will continue to accrue unfunded liabilities to be borne by tomorrow’s taxpayers and public employees since both are ultimately responsible for making the contributions needed to ensure that accrued benefits are fully paid to retirees. If contributions are not increased today, even higher increases will be required tomorrow.

It’s no wonder why public employers are struggling to attract top talent away from the private sector. New Mexico promises retirement benefits at the end of a full career then neglects to fund those benefits at adequate levels to where unfunded liabilities grow. This trend can produce rising debt payments and stagnant wages as limited state budget resources are reallocated to meet immediate needs.

The proposed reform aims to prevent that dynamic from persisting, or at least start the process. As important of a first step toward shoring up PERA’s long-term solvency the proposal is, to avoid growing state pension debt in the future will require both PERA and Educational Retirement Board stakeholders to work toward adopting more conservative actuarial assumptions, pay down pension debt faster and create attractive retirement plans for what is likely to be an increasingly professionally mobile future workforce.

Reforming a broken cost-of-living-adjustment and increasing contributions are great ways to begin addressing the PERA unfunded liability. The legislature can also harness this rare bipartisan cooperation to strengthen the task force recommendations by also addressing the systemic risk associated with high investment expectations and statutory contribution policies that will continue to generate unfunded liability unless reformed. The governor, legislative leaders and numerous stakeholders are all right, the time to reform PERA is now.

A version of this column first appeared in the Santa Fe New Mexican.

Stay in Touch with Our Pension Experts

Reason Foundation’s Pension Integrity Project has helped policymakers in states like Arizona, Colorado, Michigan, and Montana implement substantive pension reforms. Our monthly newsletter highlights the latest actuarial analysis and policy insights from our team.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.