Public Health Officials Should Support E-Cigarettes In Effort to Make Conventional Cigarettes Obsolete
ID 81020096 © Alexandra Fedorova | Dreamstime.com

Commentary

Public Health Officials Should Support E-Cigarettes In Effort to Make Conventional Cigarettes Obsolete

Public Health England concluded that e-cigarettes are about 95 percent safer than conventional cigarettes.

Amid an unprecedented percentage of teens reporting that they had vaped at least once during the past month, the Trump administration seemed poised to announce a ban on flavors in all nicotine vaping products earlier this month.

Yet after the American Medical Association (AMA) and other leading health organizations urged the White House to finalize the ban, President Donald Trump dissented and chose to delay the proposal. This prompted a temporary sigh of relief among many vaping advocates, but now the AMA is calling for a complete ban on all e-cigarette products, and many are worried about the public health implications of President Trump’s impending final decision.

The flavor ban has been, and will continue to be, a terrible idea but a complete prohibition would be even worse. A flavor ban would do little to address some valid concerns over youth vaping. Most chronic nicotine use is instigated by youth exposure. And while young people do prefer vaping flavors, they do so at a rate not much higher than adults. Recent surveys motivating these policies seem to indicate that youth vapers would mostly substitute to whatever flavors remain legal (like potentially menthol or tobacco) instead of actually quitting e-cigarettes.

When Juul first introduced its e-cigarettes to the market in 2016, fruity flavors dominated youth e-cigarette use, but after Juul voluntarily removed most of its flavors (barring mint, menthol and tobacco) from convenience stores in 2018, youth e-cigarette use continued to increase.

Mr. Trump’s concern over youth vaping is legitimate, but any ban would be bad for public health. Cigarette use among both teens and adults is now at its lowest rate in American history, and that has much to do with flavored e-cigarettes competing with conventional cigarettes. This isn’t surprising. The New England Journal of Medicine published a randomized-controlled trial showing that e-cigarettes are almost twice as effective at helping smokers quit cigarettes as FDA-approved cessation products (like nicotine gum). Public Health England also concluded that e-cigarettes are about 95 percent safer than conventional cigarettes. The evidence is clear: Public health officials should support e-cigarettes in making conventional cigarettes obsolete.

Yet for some reason, the AMA continues to support policies that would interfere with these public health promises. A flavor ban would slightly discourage vaping among youth, but it would also discourage vaping among adult smokers. Both age groups, too, would likely increase their conventional smoking rates. The BMJ, a prestigious medical publication formerly known as The British Medical Journal, published a study estimating the consequences of a flavor ban: notwithstanding additional conventional cigarette regulations, a flavor ban would reduce adult vaping by 11 percent, while increasing adult smoking by 8 percent — creating about 1.6 million additional adult smokers.

That would be unfortunate because another study in the BMJ concluded that if conventional cigarette smokers completely switched to e-cigarettes, about 6.6 million fewer people would die prematurely from smoking. That’s because nicotine consumption by itself doesn’t cause most smoking-related illnesses, which we should remember while reconciling youth vaping.

And despite acknowledging the disproportionate dangers of conventional cigarettes compared to e-cigarettes in its medical journal, JAMA, the AMA wants to go even further with a full e-cigarette prohibition. But these medical leaders are ignoring a larger health crisis that such a prohibition might cause.

The recent cases of vaping-related illnesses currently have little to do with legal nicotine products. Although some health officials have incorrectly conflated the lung illnesses with typical e-cigarette use, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have made it clear that black-market vitamin-E acetate adulteration in marijuana-derived liquids is overly responsible for the recent vaping-related lung injuries.

But if regulators ban all e-cigarettes (or even just the flavors that adult vapers overwhelmingly prefer) from the safe legal market, a nicotine black market and all its dangers might very well replace it.

A version of this column originally appeared in the Washington Times.

Jacob James Rich is a policy analyst at Reason Foundation.