The Bald Eagle's Worst Enemy: How Federal Law Pits Landowners Against Eagles
Policy Brief 64
The recovery of the bald eagle in the lower 48 states is a huge conservation success. But the lion's share of credit for the eagle's recovery should go to the 1972 ban of the pesticide DDT, not the Endangered Species Act, according to a new set of policy briefs by the Reason Foundation.
The Reason Foundation reports also suggest the Endangered Species Act often does more harm than good by pitting landowners against the very animals it is trying to save.
This Study's Materials
- Bald Eagle Off Endangered List In Spite of Feds, Not Because of Them, Press Release
Brian Seasholes - Facts & Figures, PDF, 219.1 KB
Brian Seasholes - Full Text, PDF, 559.8 KB
Brian Seasholes
Related Articles
Related Materials
- Michigan Shows How to Save Endangered Species
Compensating farmers and working with property owners pays big dividends
(7/7) - Comments on Proposed Permit Regulations for the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
Proposed permit regime puts at risk the very species the Act is supposed to protect
(9/3)
Endangered Species 
Latest From Reason
-
Vampire Family Values
Understanding the massive appeal of The Twilight Saga: New Moon
(11/20)
-
Mandating Disaster
Will Americans be forced to buy health insurance?
(11/20)
-
How to Get Ahead in Law
Bernard Baran served 22 years on dubious child molestation charges, but the prosecutor who convicted him was promoted to judge.
(11/20)
UPS Vs. FEDEX: Ultimate Whiteboard Remix
Reason Founder Robert Poole on Ayn Rand