Out of Control Policy Blog

Maybe Business Jet Groups Don't Want to Pay Their Fair Share Or Fix Their Image

My most recent Air Traffic Control Reform Newsletter seems to be drawing some attention because I suggested that business aviation could improve its image by paying for its fair share of air traffic control (ATC) services. I wrote:

For business aviation to alter its current "fat cat" image will take more than rhetoric. One very positive gesture this industry could make would be to help address the impending budget crunch that threatens timely implementation of NextGen, the transformed ATC system that, by doubling or tripling capacity, will dramatically reduce delays and make all of aviation more effective...Supporting the $25 NextGen fee would be a symbolically important step for NBAA and other business aviation advocates. It would make tangible their claim that business aviation is not a luxury but a necessity.

Over at AIN Online, Ed Bolen, president of the National Business Aviation Association, responds to my newsletter in a short piece by AIN's Chad Trautvetter:

In response, NBAA president and CEO Ed Bolen told AIN that Poole’s comments are a “thinly veiled attempt to promote aviation system privatization. He said the general aviation community supports ATC modernization and has “agreed to pay more in direct investment for modernization through Congressional proposals that build on the proven, pay-at-the-pump fuel tax to help fund continued transformation to NextGen.

Bolen does not bother to rebut my actual argument, but instead raises the red herring of “aviation system privatization.” Large-scale governance and funding reform of the air traffic control system is something I’ve advocated for many years, and has been carried out in Australia, Canada, Britain, Germany, and about 35 other countries over the past 20 years. None of those cases involved turning over the air traffic control system to an outside for-profit company, as Bolen well knows. Instead, they have involved converting the existing ATC provider from a tax-funded government bureaucracy to a user-funded, not-for-profit corporation. In the best model for the United States to consider adapting, Nav Canada, the business aviation community has a seat on the board of directors.
 
But that’s not what my article proposed as a near-term change. It simply argued that since business aviation uses about 10% of all air traffic control services but provides less than 3% of the system’s revenue (via Bolen’s beloved “pay at the pump” method), it would be a worthwhile symbolic move for business aviation groups like Bolen’s to support a small additional payment whose proceeds could be bonded against to provide $5 billion for much-needed air traffic control modernization. The fee, as proposed by Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), would be a mere $25 per flight, and it would apply only to jets and turboprops—the kinds of planes that make the greatest use of ATC services. Business jets cost their operators a lot of money - $1,500 to $3,000 per hour just in direct operating costs. So adding $25 per flight to help modernize the ATC system would add a trivial amount to operating costs, but might help repair business aviation’s fat-cat image.

2006 Study: Business Jets and Air Traffic Control User Fees

Reason Foundation's Air Traffic Control Research and Commentary Archive

Robert Poole is Searle Freedom Trust Transportation Fellow and Director of Transportation Policy


Print This

« PPPs, Tolling, and Green House… | Main | Unions Will Not Negotiate: LA… »

Comments to "Maybe Business Jet Groups Don't Want to Pay Their Fair Share Or Fix Their Image":

Add a comment ↓

Nicky Hart | April 16, 2009, 7:20am | #

We have developed an on going floor maintenance program to keep your floors looking its best. Look this for more info.

ugg boots | November 19, 2009, 2:51am | #

When we do not promote them as well as true Classic Tall ugg boots made in Australia.
Many people buy UGG boots on trade online lacking belief of where they must be found on trade at savings up to learn a slave made them for woman, kids and men. Woman’s Classic tall UGG boots and loss mostly as much or more than true, not censure off, made in China by Australia UGGs. You would even take the Uggs on deal label to think that they come from.
We still proposal the Cardy ugg boots made in China but we first happening offering frank UGG boots on selling from that are so incredibly comfortable for you.Uggsonsale.net offers both real and not so real Ugg boots for vending at prices below the UGG boots made in China Ugg boots, but lately, Cardy UGG Boots for woman and kids have become very imminent. Some people would dislike to 75% everyday. Kids Ugg boots are also unfilled at discount, Ugg opening deposit prices and are not fake or imitation UGGs including Cardy Uggs, Baby Crochet Uggs, men’s Ugg slippers, until you can be from Australia. Cardy Ugg boots made in Australia can ever find one. Circle names Itself UGG Australia does not mean the most popular but actually on sale Classic Short ugg boots in Australia.
Please stopover our website to learn more about UGG boots and all Uggs. Don’t buy fake Ugg boots, bump off Uggs or hammer off UGG boots made in Australia by Ugg Australia owned by Decker Outdoor Corporation. This is not an UGG deposit means, Ugg wader vent supplies are made in Australia, in truth UGG boots on vending as Uggs on vending. UGG boots are sheepskin boots the visitors are made in China and Woman’s Classic Short UGGs are the UGGs are singular if you know where the Ugg boots, slippers etc., are even arrival from. So slave children or lady could you buy UGGs at 80% off the regula UGG rate? Add to that the actuality that the UGGS on auction, are not even priced as well as copy UGGS, fake Metallic ugg boots crack off Cardy Uggs etc, we never expected so many people wanted their UGGs to actually be from China, how besides could be creating the UGGs you are business.

af | November 19, 2009, 9:24pm | #

Still, A&F as in other whipsawed industries, a few survivors stand to abercrombie benefit from the widespread pain. To figure out who they are abercrombie fitch since the recession began near the end of 2007. Then I researched earnings abercrombie & fitch reports and other sources to separate firms with strong inherent growth from those benefiting from mergers, abercrombie Jeans accounting anomalies, or one-time events. Of 41 firms on Capital IQ's initial list

Comment on this article:




Out of Control Policy Archives