President Obama has promised to show fiscal restraint and to reward “evidence-based” education programs. Yet, 2011 budget gives Head Start an increase of $989 million even after a January gold-standard study by the Department of Health and Human Services once again confirmed that Head Start does not offer disadvantaged students any advantage. The HHS study randomly assigned more than 5,000 preschoolers and found that by first grade not one of more than 114 academic and behavioral tests showed a reliable, statistically significant effect from participating in Head Start. Considering that a full-time, year-round, slot in Head Start costs about $22,600, as opposed to an average cost of $9,500 in a day care center; a fiscally restrained Obama could have redirected the Head Start funds to the more affordable child-care block grant. The block grant allows lower income parents to choose more cost-effective preschool providers. Instead President Obama increased Head Start funding and proposed a new $9.3 billion Early Learning Challenge Grant program to encourage states to invest in state-run universal preschool.
Get weekly updates from Reason.
Today's Top Topics
Fake Spending Freeze: Head Start Edition
- California 2014 High Speed Rail Business Plan Is Off Track (3/6)
- The Intentionally Unrealistic FY2015 Budget (3/4)
- Shallal's Top-Down Plan for D.C. Schools Hurts Parent Choice (3/3)
- Richmond CARES? (3/2)
- Government Could Improve the Development of Vehicle to Vehicle Communication by Getting Out of the Way (2/27)