Out of Control Policy Blog

California's Budget Problems Not Due to Voter Initiatives

In this column in the Wall Street Journal, Shikha, Adam and I explain why voter initiatives are NOT the source of California's budget problems.

With the Golden State still struggling to balance its books, politicians from both sides of the aisle have come up with a nifty way to avoid responsibility for the mess: Blame the voters.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, summed it up for his fellow pols recently by telling a reporter: "All of those propositions tell us how we must spend our money. . . . This is no way, of course, to run a state." State Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, a Democrat, has made similar comments in denouncing "ballot-box budgeting."

Their indictment is false. Voters aren't tying lawmakers' hands too much, but too little.

Adrian Moore is Vice President, Research


Print This

« Fitch on Using One-Time Proceeds… | Main | The Lowdown on Payday Loans »

Comments to "California's Budget Problems Not Due to Voter Initiatives":

Add a comment ↓

Randall Scott | October 3, 2009, 11:40pm | #

Unions are a huge problem.
As are the prevailing wage laws.

Curt | October 9, 2009, 3:58pm | #

Can you imagine a bankruptcy judge giving a person a break because their boss should have given them a raise. It's not their fault they can't pay their bills, because they would have been able to if the boss had given the raise they deserved.

af | November 19, 2009, 9:43pm | #

Still, A&F as in other whipsawed industries, a few survivors stand to abercrombie benefit from the widespread pain. To figure out who they are abercrombie fitch since the recession began near the end of 2007. Then I researched earnings abercrombie & fitch reports and other sources to separate firms with strong inherent growth from those benefiting from mergers, abercrombie Jeans accounting anomalies, or one-time events. Of 41 firms on Capital IQ's initial list

Comment on this article:




Out of Control Policy Archives