Reason Foundation
Search Reason
The California High-Speed Rail Proposal: A Due Diligence Report
Policy Study 370
With the high costs of building in California and the history of cost overruns on rail projects, the final price tag for the complete high-speed rail system will actually be $65 to $81 billion, according to the Reason Foundation report.
And while the Rail Authority forecasts between 65 and 96 million intercity riders by 2030, the due diligence report finds these projections are dramatically inflated. After compiling numerous ridership studies previously conducted for California rail systems, the study demonstrates the state can expect 23 million to 31 million riders a year in 2030.
Any failure to meet the Rail Authority's lofty ridership projections would force ticket-price increases, further cutting ridership, or require taxpayer subsidies to cover the financial shortfall, adding to future budget deficits. The due diligence report finds "the San Francisco-Los Angeles line alone by 2030 would suffer annual financial losses of up to $4.17 billion."
This Study's Materials
- Study: California's High-Speed Rail System Will Cost Tens of Billions More Than Estimated, Adding to State Deficit, Press Release
Joseph Vranich, Wendell Cox and Adrian Moore - Brief: Exaggerating Rails Effects on California Transportation, PDF, 152.3 KB
Joseph Vranich, Wendell Cox and Adrian Moore - Brief: High-Speed Rail Plan Is A Financial Boondoggle, PDF, 151.8 KB
Joseph Vranich, Wendell Cox and Adrian Moore - Brief: Marginal Impact on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, PDF, 154.3 KB
Joseph Vranich, Wendell Cox and Adrian Moore - Full Study, PDF, 1.7 MB
Joseph Vranich, Wendell Cox and Adrian Moore - Policy Brief, PDF, 485.9 KB
Joseph Vranich, Wendell Cox and Adrian Moore
Related Articles
Latest From Reason
-
A More Better Future
A review of Abundance: Why The Future Will Be Much Better Than You Think by X Prize guru Peter Diamandis and journalist Steven Kotler.
(2/7)
-
Jim DeMint: Why Republicans Must Become More Libertarian
S.C. Senator on Ron Paul, the Tea Party, social cons, and why he hasn't endorsed a GOP candidate
(2/7)
-
Never Let Law Profs Near the Oval Office
Constitutional law professors should be kept as far away from nuclear weapons as possible.
(2/7)
-
Romney Most Electable Candidate, Yet Gingrich in Statistical Tie Among GOP Voters
(1/31)
-
Explaining Newt?s Second Surge
Why is the disgraced former House speaker winning Republican votes?
(1/26)
-
George Washington Would Beat Out Romney as Richest President; John Kerry Would Have, Too
(1/25)
Anthony Randazzo Discusses Warren Buffett, Taxes and SOPA on Freedom Watch
On Freedom Watch, Julian Morris Discusses Breaking Up the Big Banks and Federal Power



