Murr v. Wisconsin, Supreme Court

Court Brief

Murr v. Wisconsin, Supreme Court

Amicus curiae brief in support of petitioners

In a regulatory taking case, does the “parcel as a whole” concept as described in Penn Central Transportation Company v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104, 130-31 (1978), establish a rule that two legally distinct, but commonly owned contiguous parcels, must be combined for takings analysis purposes?

Attachments