Snitko v. United States
Photo 13306534 | Financial © Davidgn | Dreamstime.com

Amicus Brief

Snitko v. United States

Reason respectfully urges the Court to permit the public filing of the deposition transcripts and reject any effort to hide them from the media or the public.

United States District Court Central District of California, Western Division

Paul Snitko, Jennifer Snitko, Joseph Ruiz, Tyler Gothier, Jeni Verdon-Pearsons, Michael Storc, and Travis May, Plaintiffs,
vs.
United States of America,
Tracy L. Wilkison, In Her Official Capacity as Acting United States Attorney for the Central District Of California, and Kiristi Koons Johnson, In Her Official Capacity as an Assistant Director of
The Federal Bureau Of Investigation, Defendants.

Brief of Amicus Curie Reason Foundation In Support of Plaintiffs’ Request Not To Seal Records; Declarations
Case 2:21-cv-04405-rgk-mar Document 120-1

The government’s assertion that the deposition transcripts in this case should be kept off the public docket while the Court decides this matter is supported by no suggestion of good cause and is expressly prohibited by the Protective Order. Reason respectfully urges the Court to permit the public filing of the deposition transcripts and reject any effort to hide them from the media or the public.

Full Brief: Snitko v. United States