Reason Foundation

http://reason.org
http://reason.org/news/show/performance-based-maintenance

Reason Foundation

Performance-Based Maintenance Contracting: Another Tool

Shirley Ybarra
June 30, 2009, 11:28am

The Transportation Research Board released a report on June 12, 2009 about Performance-Based Maintenance Contracting (PBCM).  The report looks at the practice world wide, explores the potential to reduce costs, improve levels of service in the maintenance arena as well as those factors which appear to be limiting the use of PBCM.


Performance-Based Maintenance Contracting (PBMC) is a contracting method that provides incentives and/or disincentives to the contractor to achieve desired outcomes or results; in its purest form, PBMC does not detail how, when, or where to do the work. [There are many names for PBMC used around the world from Total Maintenance (Texas) to Asset Management (Virginia) to Managing Agent contract (UK)]


Performance-Based Maintenance Contracting (PBMC) was first implemented on a wide scale in British Columbia and since then has become a mainstay of maintenance contracting in Australia, New Zealand, England, and Finland, and to an increasing degree in other countries, including the United States.  As Deputy Secretary of Transportation for the Commonwealth of Virginia, we signed the first fixed-price, long-term contract in the US for performance-based turnkey Interstate highway maintenance.  Other states now include Florida and Texas.  I have written about it here as has my colleague Len Gilroy here.

Typically, maintenance contracts (with specifications)  are for individual contracts for everything from mowing, signs, guardrails, drainage, lighting, snow removal, pavement repair, painting stripes, picking up dead animals etc.   Thus, PBMC represents a departure from standard practice in that it contracts for a wide variety of services all in one contract rather than numerous contracts with specification such as mow the grass 4 times this summer, or paint signs 2 times.  The PBMC contract will typically provide outcomes desired from fence line to fence line.  In a performance based contract, it would say “keep the grass no more that 6 inches high” (and there is no specification that is needs to be mowed if some other method is available); for the signage, PBMC would be based on reflectivity measures, thus not specifying how many times the signs are painted (after all they may not need it). Guardrails:  replace when certain problems occur as opposed to “replace guard rails every other year” (Yes that is done whether needed or not)   And so on and so on.

The report contains a great amount of detail, but a few significant conclusions are in order:

The use of Performance-Based Maintenance Contracting (PBMC) is accelerating worldwide. By 2005, 35 countries had performance-based maintenance contracts. By early 2006, approximately 15 more were exploring this approach to maintenance.

A couple of telling conclusions: 

Every state is facing a budget crunch on their highway program.  We know that there is no panacea for highway maintenance costs however the PBMC has distincct advantages and should be included in every state’s tool kit of contracting options.

The reasons are obvious but just to recap:

• Fixed long-term price (no change orders, beats inflation)
• Performance-based results
• Cost Savings 
• Reduction/transfer of risks
• Fewer contracts to administer
• Savings in administrative staff and resources
• Program stability


Shirley Ybarra is Senior Transportation Policy Analyst


Print This