Reason Foundation

http://reason.org
http://reason.org/news/show/mobility-project-state-by-stat-25

Reason Foundation

Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Kentucky

August 1, 2006

 
     
       
 


How bad will traffic congestion be in 2030? How much construction and how many new lane miles will each state and major city need to add over the next 25 years to prevent severe congestion? And how much will it all cost? The Reason Foundation study Building Roads to Reduce Traffic Congestion in America's Cities: How Much and at What Cost? and its addendum, A Detailed State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs, provide in-depth answers to these questions. An interactive map ranking the states by congestion and costs to reduce traffic is here and a map of the most congested cities is here.


 
 

Kentucky

[view other states]

 
 


To significantly reduce today's severe congestion and prepare for growth expected by 2030, Kentucky needs just over 1,200 new lane-miles at a total cost of $4.6 billion, in today's dollars. That's a cost of approximately $120 per resident each year. Kentucky ranks 24th out of 50 states and the District of Columbia in terms of most lane-miles needed and 19th in the total costs of those improvements. If the state made these improvements, it would save almost 23 million hours per year that are now wasted in traffic jams.

Kentucky has one city that currently suffers from severe congestion, which this study identifies as those areas with Travel Time Indices (TTIs) of 1.18 or higher. The Ohio River city of Louisville is the 32nd most congested region in the United States (sharing that 'honor' with Indianapolis), with a TTI of 1.24. This means that driving times during peak traffic are 24 percent longer than during off-peak times.

Unless major steps are taken to relieve congestion, drivers in the Louisville area can expect to see a TTI of 1.44 by 2030. For an idea of how severe that level of congestion would be, note that this projection is higher than the traffic delays experienced today in all but five cities across the United States: Atlanta, Washington, DC, San Francisco, Chicago and Los Angeles. But Kentucky can significantly reduce this congestion problem by adding about 1,200 new lane-miles by 2030 at an estimated cost of $4.6 billion in today's dollars.

This investment would save an estimated 23 million hours per year that are now lost sitting in traffic, at a yearly cost of $8.05 per delay-hour saved. This does not account for the additional benefits not quantified in this study, including: lower fuel use, reduced accident rates and vehicle operating costs, lower shipping costs and truck travel time reductions, greater freight reliability, and a number of benefits associated with greater community accessibility, including an expanded labor pool for employers and new job choices for workers.

As Table 23 suggests, the other cities in Kentucky with populations over 50,000 are currently much less congested than Louisville and have TTIs in the 1.04�1.05 range. However, the relative increase in delay projected over the next 25 years for these cities is 100 percent, which is actually higher than the Louisville area's 83 percent increase. (The 'delay' in the travel time is the portion of the TTI over 1.0.) Such significant increases will be sharply felt by local commuters. With TTIs of 1.08, the small cities of Radcliff-Elizabethtown, Owensboro, and Bowling Green are facing future traffic delays similar to those currently experienced in much larger cities like Dayton and Spokane.


(click here for larger image)

» Return to Index Page: Study, State-By-State Data, Maps
» Return to Interactive Map of Traffic U.S. Congestion Statistics and Construction Needs


This information is excerpted from A Detailed State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs and Building Roads to Reduce Traffic Congestion in America's Cities: How Much and at What Cost?

Additional Resources:
» Reason Foundation's Mobility Project Main Page
» Reason Foundation's Transportation Research and Commentary
» Reason Foundation's Press Room

» return to top

 


Print This