Reason Foundation

http://reason.org
http://reason.org/news/show/mobility-project-state-by-stat-12

Reason Foundation

Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - New Hampshire

August 1, 2006

 
     
       
 


How bad will traffic congestion be in 2030? How much construction and how many new lane miles will each state and major city need to add over the next 25 years to prevent severe congestion? And how much will it all cost? The Reason Foundation study Building Roads to Reduce Traffic Congestion in America's Cities: How Much and at What Cost? and its addendum, A Detailed State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs, provide in-depth answers to these questions. An interactive map ranking the states by congestion and costs to reduce traffic is here and a map of the most congested cities is here.


 
 

New Hampshire

[view other states]

 
 


To significantly reduce today's severe congestion and prepare for growth expected by 2030, New Hampshire needs some 218 new lane-miles at a total cost of $302 million, in today's dollars. That's a cost of approximately $27 per resident each year. New Hampshire ranks 43rd out of 50 states and the District of Columbia in terms of most lane-miles needed and 43rd in the total costs of those improvements. If the state made these improvements, it would save over 1.8 million hours per year that are now wasted in traffic jams.

As Table 35 suggests, New Hampshire really does not have a significant traffic congestion problem, although there are likely to be specific sites in the state where traffic does have some major adverse impacts. The three cities in New Hampshire with populations over 50,000, Nashua, Manchester, and Portsmouth-Dover, all have Travel Time Indices (TTIs) of 1.04. This means that driving times during peak traffic hours is 4 percent longer than during off-peak times. While this TTI does not reach the 1.18 level that this study identifies as severe congestion, the relative increase in delay projected over the next 25 years is 125 percent, which will be sharply noticed by local commuters. (The 'delay' in the travel time is that portion of the TTI over 1.0.) To put things into perspective, TTIs of around 1.09, reflect current traffic in cities such as Cleveland, Richmond-Petersburg, and Spokane. New Hampshire could solve this limited problem by adding 218 new lane-miles by 2030 at an estimated cost of $302 million in today's dollars.

This investment would save an estimated 1.8 million hours per year that are now lost sitting in traffic, at a yearly cost of $6.71 per delay-hour saved. This does not account for the additional benefits not quantified in this study, including: lower fuel use, reduced accident rates and vehicle operating costs, lower shipping costs and truck travel time reductions, greater freight reliability, and a number of benefits associated with greater community accessibility, including an expanded labor pool for employers and new job choices for workers.


(click here for larger image)

» Return to Index Page: Study, State-By-State Data, Maps
» Return to Interactive Map of Traffic U.S. Congestion Statistics and Construction Needs


This information is excerpted from A Detailed State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs and Building Roads to Reduce Traffic Congestion in America's Cities: How Much and at What Cost?

Additional Resources:
» Reason Foundation's Mobility Project Main Page
» Reason Foundation's Transportation Research and Commentary
» Reason Foundation's Press Room

» return to top

 


Print This