Mobility Project 
Recent Research and Commentary
Is the Goal to Reduce Emissions, Fuel Use or Mobility?
June 15, 2009, 5:05pmSuffice it to say that if the goal is to reduce CO2 or petroleum use, Congress should target those things directly.
Transit Funding Could Come from the General Fund, Not the Highway Trust Fund
June 12, 2009, 8:01amMy friend and colleague Alan Pisarski last week proposed what I think is a very promising—if radical—idea. “If we are going to need an infusion from the general fund, and we also need more total funding, why not ‘resolve’ the question of share by avoiding the question? Transfer the transit program 100 percent to the general fund and use all the Highway Trust Fund for highways. It might be a win-win.”
Learning From Abroad: Public-Private Partnerships Building Highways Overseas
June 12, 2009, 7:00amSome of the recent U.S. debates about public-private partnerships for highways sound as if the idea is brand new, untried, and hence inherently risky. Yet long-term concession agreements under which the private sector can design, finance, build, operate, and maintain major highways, bridges, and tunnels date back to the 1960s in Europe and the 1990s in Australia.
President Obama vs. The Beach Boys
June 11, 2009, 5:59pmAs a long-time Beach Boys fan, and as still a bit of a car buff, I was intrigued by this headline on Daniel Henninger’s Wall Street Journal column of May 28, 2009. Basically, the column was a lament for what Henninger sees as the passing of America’s car culture, as most recently epitomized by the idea that the Obama administration’s new 39 mpg CAFÉ standard is an “everybody wins” policy.
Performance-Based Transportation Spending and Policy
June 11, 2009, 5:27pmI am all in favor of performance-based funding, wherever this can possibly be done. But throwing out—rather than strengthening—the user-pays/user-benefits principle is too high a price to pay. A better course would be to shame Congress into creating accountable, performance-based funding within existing modal programs.
Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Without Reducing Mobility
Focusing on cutting vehicle miles traveled is the wrong approach
June 9, 2009All of transportation (including trucking, airlines, barges, etc.) contributes 27.9 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Personal vehicles (cars and light trucks) are 61 percent of that; hence, personal vehicles are the source of 17 percent of GHGs, not one-third, as you will often hear. Second, greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles are a function of speed. Stop-and-go driving (as in congestion) produces much greater GHG emissions than steady-speed driving between 30 and 60 miles per hour; above about 60 mph, GHGs increase fairly rapidly.
View Resources by Type
StudiesBlog PostsOp-EdsReason.comReason.tv
- Reducing Congestion in Lee County, Florida
Cutting traffic in one of America's fastest growing urban areas
Robert Poole and Chris Swenson
February 26, 2009 - Why Mobility Matters to Personal Life
Policy Brief 62
Ted Balaker
July 1, 2007 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Colorado
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Kentucky
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - Cities Ranked by Worst Travel Time Delays
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Maryland
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Nevada
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - West Virginia
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - North Dakota
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Louisiana
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - New Jersey
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - New Hampshire
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - California
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Oklahoma
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Montana
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Kansas
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - South Carolina
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - North Carolina
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Alaska
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Florida
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Washington
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - District of Columbia
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Texas
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Connecticut
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Rhode Island
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Indiana
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Hawaii
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Delaware
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Wyoming
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Alabama
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - New Mexico
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Missouri
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Tennessee
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - South Dakota
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Nebraska
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Ohio
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Vermont
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Georgia
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Maine
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Utah
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Massachusetts
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Michigan
August 1, 2006 - Building Roads to Reduce Traffic Congestion in America's Cities: How Much and at What Cost?
Detailed State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs
August 1, 2006 - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Illinois
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - New York
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Iowa
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Arkansas
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Virginia
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Oregon
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Idaho
August 1, 2006 - Why Mobility Matters
Ted Balaker
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - List of Most Congested States
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Pennsylvania
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Wisconsin
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Arizona
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Minnesota
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Mississippi
August 1, 2006
Related Topics
Poole's Newsletter
- Surface Transportation Innovations #67
Topics include: bills to curtail toll road PPPs; caution on economic impact studies; carbon caps; tunnels to somewhere; buses vs. inter-city rail; and other news.
May 15, 2009
Robert Poole - More
Experts: Mobility Project
RSS Feeds: Mobility Project
Media Contact
Chris MitchellDirector of Communications
Email
(310) 367-6109
Support Reason
Your tax-deductible gift can help us promote individual liberty, choice, and free minds and free markets.




