Galvin Mobility Project 
Most of our great cities began as hubs for commerce, where motion was constant. But now, chronic traffic congestion slows the motion that made our cities vital and prosperous. If we are to save our slowing cities, we must act boldly.
The Galvin Project to End Congestion is producing the solutions that will end congestion as a regular part of life.
- Advisory Board
- Project Description
- Vision Statement
- Bob Galvin
- Animations of Transportation Innovations
Recent Research and Commentary
China Mobility Project
An overview of Reason Foundation's China Mobility Project
October 26, 2009As part of the Galvin Project to End Congestion, Reason Foundation is engaged in a multiyear study of the impacts of traffic congestion on urban mobility and economic competitiveness and developing practical market-oriented solutions for policymakers.
A crucial component of this program is the investigation of private sector participation and involvement in providing, financing, managing, and operating transportation infrastructure. As part of our examination, Reason is actively researching transportation initiatives abroad through its China Mobility Project.
The China Mobility Project research team includes Reason Foundation Vice President Dr. Adrian Moore, Reason urban policy expert Dr. Samuel Staley, and transportation engineer Dr. Zongzhi Li.
World Car Free Day Tomorrow---Buy Your Bread and Milk Now
September 21, 2009, 10:54amWorld Car Free Day is anti mobility
Daniel Burnham: Congestion is a Menace
September 8, 2009, 11:50amIn the Plan of Chicago, the watershed planning document that has shaped much of current day professional planning, the principal authors condemned traffic congestion and presented a bold road building strategy to tame it.
Smart Growth, Traffic Congestion Reduce Growth
September 3, 2009, 2:25amThe newsmedia is increasingly taking note of the detrimental impact of traffic congestion on economic growth and the potential harmful effects of Smart Growth.
Gridlock and Growth: The Effect of Traffic Congestion on Regional Economic Performance
How reducing traffic congestion can add billions of dollars in economic growth to local economies
Policy Study 371
August 27, 2009
David T. Hartgen, M. Gregory Fields
Traffic congestion increases costs to American businesses, workers and families. It increasingly takes more time and fuel to get where we want to go, costing us time and money. As traffic congestion worsens, it will significantly undermine the economic competitiveness of U.S. cities and regions.
Perhaps one reason policymakers have not done more to reduce gridlock is a lack of understanding about how congestion negatively impacts our cities and their competitiveness. What would be the benefits of achieving free-flow travel conditions on a regional scale?
This study examines the economics of congestion relief. The report, authored by David Hartgen and Gregory Fields, finds that reducing congestion can add billions of dollars in productivity and economic output for cities. Free-flowing traffic increases regional productivity, which also increases tax revenues for local governments.
Most major cities will find that wise infrastructure investments that eliminate gridlock and produce free-flowing road conditions will more than pay for themselves by boosting the region’s economy, and thus tax revenues. The study shows that reducing congestion and increasing travel speeds enough to improve access by 10 percent to key employment, retail, education and population centers increases regional production of goods and services by 1 percent. While seemingly small in percentage terms, this leads to tens of billions of dollars for a region’s employers and workers due to productivity and efficiency benefits.
Toll Roads and Public-Private Partnerships in Texas
Past debacles and what the future holds
July 29, 2009The same huge highway funding shortfall that still faces Texas exists just about every place else, especially in fast-growing states like Arizona, California, Georgia, and Virginia. This spring both Arizona and California enacted sweeping new enabling legislation for public-private partnership toll roads (as did Puerto Rico). Both Arizona and California were early pioneers in this area but suffered backlashes that led to no projects getting authorized in the former and only two in California (and the later repeal of its pilot program legislation). And given the interest and need for funding of large new projects in Michigan, New York, and Pennsylvania, I expect PPP toll road legislation to be enacted soon in at least two of the three. And progress continues on large-scale concession projects in Florida and Virginia.
View Resources by Type
StudiesBlog PostsOp-EdsReason.comReason.tv
- Gridlock and Growth: The Effect of Traffic Congestion on Regional Economic Performance
How reducing traffic congestion can add billions of dollars in economic growth to local economies
Policy Study 371
David T. Hartgen and M. Gregory Fields
August 27, 2009 - Reducing Congestion in Lee County, Florida
Cutting traffic in one of America's fastest growing urban areas
Robert Poole and Chris Swenson
February 26, 2009 - Why Mobility Matters to Personal Life
Policy Brief 62
Ted Balaker
July 1, 2007 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Arizona
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Minnesota
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Mississippi
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Colorado
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Kentucky
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - Cities Ranked by Worst Travel Time Delays
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Maryland
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Nevada
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - West Virginia
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - North Dakota
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Louisiana
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - New Jersey
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - New Hampshire
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - California
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Oklahoma
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Montana
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Kansas
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - South Carolina
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - North Carolina
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Alaska
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Florida
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Washington
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - District of Columbia
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Texas
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Connecticut
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Rhode Island
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Indiana
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Hawaii
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Delaware
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Wyoming
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Alabama
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - New Mexico
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Missouri
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Tennessee
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - South Dakota
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Nebraska
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Ohio
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Vermont
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Georgia
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Maine
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Utah
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Massachusetts
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Michigan
August 1, 2006 - Building Roads to Reduce Traffic Congestion in America's Cities: How Much and at What Cost?
Detailed State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs
August 1, 2006 - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Illinois
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - New York
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Iowa
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Arkansas
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Virginia
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Oregon
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Idaho
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - List of Most Congested States
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Pennsylvania
August 1, 2006 - Mobility Project - State-by-State Analysis of Future Congestion and Capacity Needs - Wisconsin
August 1, 2006 - Why Mobility Matters
Ted Balaker
August 1, 2006
Out of Control Policy Blog - Transportation
- National Journal Forum Spotlights Transportation Policy Reform (11/18)
- National Journal Holds Transportation Forum on Tuesday, November 17th. (11/16)
- Bob Poole (Quoted by Steve Forbes) Has It Right: Airline Deregulation is not to Blame (11/11)
- Atlas Shrugged, Railroads and Warren Buffet (11/3)
- More Travel = Higher Income = Lower Energy Use (10/31)
Related Topics
Poole's Newsletter
- Surface Transportation Innovations #73
Progress converting carpool lanes into toll lanes, vehicle miles traveled and the economy, and phasing out gas taxes
November 13, 2009
Robert Poole - More
Experts: Galvin Mobility Project
RSS Feeds: Galvin Mobility Project
Media Contact
Chris MitchellDirector of Communications
Email
(310) 367-6109
Support Reason
Your tax-deductible gift can help us promote individual liberty, choice, and free minds and free markets.




